This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Pregnancy: An important aspect of primary diabetes care

Colin Kenny

Diabetes is one of the most common pre-existing medical disorders complicating pregnancy (Bell et al, 2008). Having either type 1 or type 2 diabetes increases the likelihood of poor pregnancy outcomes, and diabetes in the mother can impact significantly on the health of the neonate in the perinatal period and beyond (National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health [NCCWCH], 2008). In recognising these risks, primary care teams should be making a much more significant contribution to preparing women with diabetes for pregnancy, supporting them through it and ensuring active follow-up during the postnatal period. 

Fertility and pre-pregnancy counselling
Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes can impair fertility (Livshits and Seidman, 2009). Polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with type 2 diabetes and infertility due to anovulation (Boomsma et al, 2006). The reproductive period of a woman with diabetes may be reduced due to delayed menarche and premature menopause. Better glycaemic control, and prevention of diabetes complications, improves menstrual irregularities and increases fertility rates close to those that are seen in the general population.

Primary care should be an important source of counselling about the risks of pregnancy for women with diabetes but, unfortunately, many become pregnant inadequately prepared (Mortagy et al, 2010). Women with diabetes who are planning to become pregnant should be informed that establishing good glycaemic control before conception and continuing this throughout pregnancy will reduce the risk of miscarriage, congenital malformation, stillbirth and neonatal death (Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health, 2007). Valerie Holmes (page 332) discusses the development of a DVD in Northern Ireland that may help primary care teams ensure that women with diabetes are well informed.

Pregnancy in women with type 2 diabetes
Type 2 diabetes is now the most common form of diabetes in women of reproductive age in developed countries (Dunstan et al, 2002). Pregnancy outcomes for women with type 2 diabetes are also significantly worse compared with the general population and are at least as poor as for women with type 1 diabetes (Hod and Simeoni, 2009). Many women with type 2 diabetes receive routine diabetes care in the community and, unlike women with type 1 diabetes, may not be aware of the importance of optimal glycaemic control at the time of conception and the critical 6–7 weeks thereafter (McDowell et al, 2009). 

Glycaemic control
Where possible, pregnancies in women with diabetes should be actively managed in joint clinics staffed by diabetes specialists and obstetricians. Individualised targets for blood glucose levels and self-monitoring should be agreed, taking into account the risk of hypoglycaemia (NCCWCH, 2008). If it is safely achievable, pregnant women with diabetes should aim to keep fasting blood glucose levels between 3.5 and 5.9 mmol/L and 1-hour postprandial blood glucose levels below 7.8 mmol/L. Often, insulin therapy is required to achieve this (Diabetes UK, 2008).

In the immediate postnatal period, both the mother and the neonate need careful monitoring. 

Gestational diabetes
Gestational diabetes (GD) is defined as glucose intolerance with onset during pregnancy. Its prevalence in the general population is 9% but it occurs with greater prevalence in obese women (6–12%) when compared with their lean counterparts (2–4%) (Solomon et al, 1997). In the article by Michael Dennedy et al (page 337), the increasing hazard from GD is outlined as well as a call to actively screen, and reduce, associated complications. 

Conclusion
The burgeoning numbers of young women with type 2 diabetes means that primary care health professionals have an important and evolving role in ensuring excellent pregnancy outcomes, by giving robust pre-pregnancy counselling, supporting the pregnant woman with diabetes and ensuring active follow-up in the postnatal period.

Diabetes is one of the most common pre-existing medical disorders complicating pregnancy (Bell et al, 2008). Having either type 1 or type 2 diabetes increases the likelihood of poor pregnancy outcomes, and diabetes in the mother can impact significantly on the health of the neonate in the perinatal period and beyond (National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health [NCCWCH], 2008). In recognising these risks, primary care teams should be making a much more significant contribution to preparing women with diabetes for pregnancy, supporting them through it and ensuring active follow-up during the postnatal period. 

Fertility and pre-pregnancy counselling
Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes can impair fertility (Livshits and Seidman, 2009). Polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with type 2 diabetes and infertility due to anovulation (Boomsma et al, 2006). The reproductive period of a woman with diabetes may be reduced due to delayed menarche and premature menopause. Better glycaemic control, and prevention of diabetes complications, improves menstrual irregularities and increases fertility rates close to those that are seen in the general population.

Primary care should be an important source of counselling about the risks of pregnancy for women with diabetes but, unfortunately, many become pregnant inadequately prepared (Mortagy et al, 2010). Women with diabetes who are planning to become pregnant should be informed that establishing good glycaemic control before conception and continuing this throughout pregnancy will reduce the risk of miscarriage, congenital malformation, stillbirth and neonatal death (Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health, 2007). Valerie Holmes (page 332) discusses the development of a DVD in Northern Ireland that may help primary care teams ensure that women with diabetes are well informed.

Pregnancy in women with type 2 diabetes
Type 2 diabetes is now the most common form of diabetes in women of reproductive age in developed countries (Dunstan et al, 2002). Pregnancy outcomes for women with type 2 diabetes are also significantly worse compared with the general population and are at least as poor as for women with type 1 diabetes (Hod and Simeoni, 2009). Many women with type 2 diabetes receive routine diabetes care in the community and, unlike women with type 1 diabetes, may not be aware of the importance of optimal glycaemic control at the time of conception and the critical 6–7 weeks thereafter (McDowell et al, 2009). 

Glycaemic control
Where possible, pregnancies in women with diabetes should be actively managed in joint clinics staffed by diabetes specialists and obstetricians. Individualised targets for blood glucose levels and self-monitoring should be agreed, taking into account the risk of hypoglycaemia (NCCWCH, 2008). If it is safely achievable, pregnant women with diabetes should aim to keep fasting blood glucose levels between 3.5 and 5.9 mmol/L and 1-hour postprandial blood glucose levels below 7.8 mmol/L. Often, insulin therapy is required to achieve this (Diabetes UK, 2008).

In the immediate postnatal period, both the mother and the neonate need careful monitoring. 

Gestational diabetes
Gestational diabetes (GD) is defined as glucose intolerance with onset during pregnancy. Its prevalence in the general population is 9% but it occurs with greater prevalence in obese women (6–12%) when compared with their lean counterparts (2–4%) (Solomon et al, 1997). In the article by Michael Dennedy et al (page 337), the increasing hazard from GD is outlined as well as a call to actively screen, and reduce, associated complications. 

Conclusion
The burgeoning numbers of young women with type 2 diabetes means that primary care health professionals have an important and evolving role in ensuring excellent pregnancy outcomes, by giving robust pre-pregnancy counselling, supporting the pregnant woman with diabetes and ensuring active follow-up in the postnatal period.

REFERENCES:

Bell R, Bailey K, Cresswell T et al (2008) BJOG 115: 445–52
Boomsma CM, Eijkemans MJ, Hughes EG et al (2006) Hum Reprod Update 12: 673–83
Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2007) Diabetes in Pregnancy: Are We Providing the Best Care? Findings of a National Enquiry. CEMACH, London
Diabetes UK (2008) Recommendations for the Management of Pregnant Women with Diabetes (Including Gestational Diabetes). Diabetes UK, London
Dunstan DW, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA et al (2002) Diabetes Care 25: 829–34
Hod M, Simeoni U (2009) Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 14: 63–5
Livshits A, Seidman DS (2009) Womens Health (Lond Engl) 5: 701–7
McDowell JR, McPhail K, Halyburton G et al (2009) J Adv Nurs 65: 1432–41
Mortagy I, Kielmann K, Baldeweg S et al (2010) Br J Gen Pract 60: 815–21
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (2008) Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. NICE, London
Solomon CG, Willett WC, Carey VJ et al (1997) JAMA 278: 1078–83

Related content
Diabetes Distilled: Optimising glycaemic control is still important, especially early in type 2 diabetes
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.