This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Journal of
Diabetes Nursing


Share this article

Dapagliflozin: An effective adjunctive treatment in type 1 diabetes

Ghasem Yadegarfar
, Mark Livingston
, Gabriela Cortes
, Ramadan Alshames
, Kate Leivesley
, Ann Metters
, Linda Horne
, Tom Steele
, Adrian H Heald
Many people with type 1 diabetes continue to have high HbA1c levels despite insulin therapy, with an associated elevated risk of cardiovascular events and increased mortality. Adjunctive prescription of a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in type 1 diabetes has been approved as a potential intervention. In this case series, the authors report the outcomes of six adults with type 1 diabetes who initiated on dapagliflozin in East Cheshire. Over a 6-month period, mean HbA1c fell from 78.5 mmol/mol (9.3%) to 55 mmol/mol (7.2%). Analysis of flash glucose monitoring data showed that the proportion of readings in the target range (4–10 mmol/L) increased from 33.1% to 65.2% following addition of dapagliflozin, while the proportion of readings above target (>10 mmol/L) decreased from 68.0% to 26.4%. Dapagliflozin was well tolerated and improved glycaemic control with no increase in hypoglycaemia rates.

The achievement of better glycaemic control remains a challenge for people with type 1 diabetes and their healthcare professionals. Despite major advances in the pharmacological management of type 1 diabetes in recent years (Iqbal et al, 2018), with widespread availability of insulin analogues and increasing access to expert patient programmes, many people with type 1 diabetes continue to have high HbA1c levels (Anderson et al, 2012; Heald et al, 2018). Studies suggest that less than one third of people with type 1 diabetes achieve optimal glycaemic control (an HbA1c of <53 mmol/mol [7.0%]; McKnight et al, 2015; Miller et al, 2015), with similar results observed using data from the National Diabetes Audit (Heald et al, 2018). Suboptimal glycaemic control is associated with increased likelihood of cardiovascular disease and associated events (de Ferranti et al, 2014).

Intensive insulin management is currently the only option for effective treatment of type 1 diabetes. However, even when target HbA1c levels are achieved, there is still evidence of excess mortality rates in people with type 1 diabetes (Lind et al, 2014).

Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors block the SGLT2 transporter in the proximal renal tubule, resulting in glucosuria and natriuresis, and are approved and indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (Kalra, 2014). Owing to their oral route of administration, low risk of hypoglycaemia and proven cardiovascular and renal benefits in type 2 diabetes, there is increasing interest in using these drugs for the treatment of type 1 diabetes, with two recent clinical trials demonstrating their efficacy in this regard (Dandona et al, 2018; Mathieu et al, 2018).

In the area of Eastern Cheshire, UK, the diabetes specialist nurse (DSN) team has been an early adopter of dapagliflozin in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. At the time of writing, dapagliflozin is the only SGLT2 inhibitor licensed in the UK for the treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices display an estimate of blood glucose levels along with trends in direction, either in real time or with intermittent scanning. In the eyes of many, they are proving to be a step change in type 1 diabetes management, and they are now widely used in the UK and elsewhere. Use of CGM itself is associated with a reduction in HbA1c (Pickup et al, 2011; Heald et al, 2019).

The DSN team in Eastern Cheshire works across a mixed urban and rural catchment area south of the conurbation of Greater Manchester. It provides an outreach service to GP practices across the area, as well as clinics at a central location. There are at least 1000 people known to have type 1 diabetes in Eastern Cheshire, of whom the majority are managed in primary care. The specialist service sees people with type 1 diabetes in an episodic care model so that, once glycaemia has been stabilised, the person with diabetes returns to primary care.

In this article, we describe our experience of adding dapagliflozin to insulin therapy and its impact on HbA1c and glycaemic profile.


In this real-world study, we report the outcomes of six adults (18 years of age or older) with type 1 diabetes who initiated adjunctive dapagliflozin treatment after continuing to have suboptimal glycaemic control in spite of intensive treatment with a basal–bolus insulin regimen. Dapagliflozin was initiated with education and support from one of the DSNs. All participants had an HbA1c of 70 mmol/mol (8.6%) or higher prior to initiation. All had been monitoring glycaemia with the FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitor for at least 6 months prior to this.

Dapagliflozin was prescribed at the dose of 5 mg daily. Dose adjustments in insulin were subsequently made but contact continued at the same frequency as before with the DSN team. None of the participants attended an expert patient education programme during the follow-up period, nor had they attended such a programme in the previous 12 months.

HbA1c was recorded at baseline, at 3 months after the start of monitoring and at 6 months for all patients. BMI was recorded at the time of initiation of monitoring. Subsequent monitoring of BMI was not possible because of changes in patient contact with general practice and specialist services in the UK as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ethics statement

This was a quality improvement project. Ethics approval was not obtained for this study, as the treatment was being given as part of standard care according to NICE (2015) guidance. All individuals’ data were anonymised prior to statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Comparison of HbA1c pre- and post-dapagliflozin initiation was made by paired t-tests. Outcomes were reported as means with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and their range. Data were analysed using STATA 14 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).


The mean duration of type 1 diabetes in the six participants was 23.3 years (range, 9.3–37.4 years). The mean age of the individuals was 43.8 years (range, 30–68 years). Baseline HbA1c varied from 70 to 104 mmol/mol. BMI at baseline ranged from 18.7 to 42.3 kg/m2. Four people were taking metformin in addition to their insulin regimens.

All six people were on a basal–bolus regimen prior to starting dapagliflozin. One of the individuals was on insulin glargine and five were on insulin degludec. For their short-acting insulins, four were on Novorapid, one on Apidra and one on Fiasp.

The mean pre-intervention HbA1c was 78.5 mmol/mol (95% CI, 64.4–92.6 mmol/mol). At 3 months after initiation, mean HbA1c fell significantly to 59.0 mmol/mol (95% CI, 48.2–69.8 mmol/mol), a reduction of 19.5 mmol/mol (P=0.008; Figure 1).

At 6 months, mean HbA1c had fallen further, by 23.5 mmol/mol compared with baseline (P=0.005), to 55.0 mmol/mol (95% CI, 47.6–62.4 mmol/mol; Figure 1).

Analysis of the flash glucose monitoring records showed that the proportion of blood glucose readings on target (4–10 mmol/L) increased from 33.1% to 65.2% at 6 months following addition of dapagliflozin (P=0.007). The proportion of blood glucose readings above target (>10 mmol/L) decreased from 68.0% to 26.4% at 6 months after initiation of dapagliflozin (P=0.005).

The proportion of blood glucose readings below target (<4 mmol/L) increased slightly from 1.5% to 5.6% at 6 months (P=0.04). However, there was no increase in the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia (average of 3.4 episodes in the 6 months pre-dapagliflozin vs 3.1 episodes in the 6 months post-dapagliflozin). None of the users discontinued dapagliflozin over the 6-month follow-up period.

Representative glucose profiles

Figure 2 shows representative blood glucose traces pre- and post-dapagliflozin initiation, taken from Participant 3. These show that the mean blood glucose level throughout the day decreased with dapagliflozin, with the range of blood glucose readings becoming much more closely distributed around the mean. Pre-dapagliflozin, the majority of blood glucose readings through the 14-day period were >10 mmol/L, whereas, at 6 months post-dapagliflozin, only a small proportion of readings were above 10 mmol/L. There were similar improvements in glycaemic profiles for all participants.


Participant narrative (Participant 4)

“I was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 30, and 18 years on I felt no further forward with my control. It seemed that the harder I tried the worse my control was and at times it just felt that insulin didn’t work, as in general my blood sugar was always high.

When my specialist nurse L. told me about dapagliflozin I was sceptical to say the least! I just didn’t like the description of how it worked and the possible side effects. However, after some thinking I decided to try the tablets.

Almost instantly things changed! It felt like suddenly insulin started to work properly and I started to get straight lines within target on my chart. I had never had this before; in fact, I have had some days of 100% in target. It’s the type of control that I just didn’t think was possible for me.

It has now been approximately 6 months since I started taking dapagliflozin and I have had no noticeable side effects.

Of course, nothing with diabetics is perfect and I still have the occasional bad day but now I can tell why and fix things quickly.

In my experience dapagliflozin has been a total game changer!”


These findings are persuasive evidence to support the addition of dapagliflozin in people with type 1 diabetes whose blood glucose levels are above target. After 6 months of adjunct dapagliflozin therapy, the mean reduction in HbA1c was 23.5 mmol/mol (2.1%) in these individuals. Thus, we conclude that the addition of an SGLT2 inhibitor has the potential to help people to manage their type 1 diabetes more effectively. The improved glycaemic control has major implications in terms of potentially reduced complication rates and reduced mortality in the future. In addition, the participant narrative gives a moving account of the way that this treatment changed the life of one person.

None of the users in this study attended a structured expert patient programme during the 6-month follow-up or in the previous 12 months. Therefore, the changes in glycaemia are likely to be a result of the addition of dapagliflozin, as far as it is possible to conclude this in a real-world case series.

Safety concerns

The benefits of using SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of type 1 diabetes should be balanced against the increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). In the clinical trials, the incidence of definite DKA events was higher with dapagliflozin than with placebo (rates of around 4% in DEPICT-1 and 2.5% in DEPICT-2; Dandona et al, 2018; Mathieu et al, 2018). None of our participants experienced an episode of DKA on dapagliflozin, and the incidence of hypoglycaemia (83% of participants) was similar to that in DEPICT-2 (Mathieu et al, 2018).

The increase in absolute risk of an episode of DKA, even in closely supervised patients participating in clinical trials, raises a concern that DKA will be even more common if SGLT2 inhibitors are used routinely. A number of participants in studies have presented with euglycemic DKA (that with near-normal or only mildly elevated blood glucose levels), which has delayed recognition and definitive action. The increased risk of DKA may be attributable to patients on SGLT2 inihibitors not recognising early signs of metabolic decompensation, which can occur at relatively normal blood glucose levels. Thus, it may be advisable to limit adjunctive use of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 1 diabetes to those specialists who are cogniscent of the potential risks associated this class of treatment (Wolfsdorf and Ratner, 2019).


We have shown that the addition of dapagliflozin is an effective intervention to improve glycaemia in people with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes. If sustained, the improvements in blood glucose control seen here with dapagliflozin should result in reduced diabetes-related complications over the course of type 1 diabetes treatment.


The authors would like to acknowledge Vernova Healthcare CIC for supporting the evaluation of the intervention.

Data availability

Any requests for data extracts will be considered by Dr Adrian Heald as corresponding author.


Anderson SG, Narayanan RP, Amlesh J et al (2012) Type 1 diabetes in Cheshire: cardiometabolic risk factor trends (2004–2009). Prim Care Diabetes 6: 123–6
Dandona P, Mathieu C, Phillip M et al; DEPICT-1 investigators (2018) Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes: the DEPICT-1 52-week study. Diabetes Care 41: 2552–9
de Ferranti SD, de Boer IH, Fonseca V et al (2014) Type 1 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 37: 2843–63
Heald AH, Livingston M, Fryer A et al (2018) Route to improving type 1 diabetes mellitus glycaemic outcomes: real-world evidence taken from the National Diabetes Audit. Diabet Med 35: 63–71
Heald AH, Yadegarfar G, Anderson SG et al (2019) The FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system: How it has improved glycaemic control for people with type 1 diabetes in Eastern Cheshire, UK. Journal of Diabetes Nursing 23: JDN072
Iqbal A, Novodvorsky P, Heller SR (2018) Recent updates on type 1 diabetes mellitus management for clinicians. Diabetes Metab J 42: 3–18
Kalra S (2014) Sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a review of their basic and clinical pharmacology. Diabetes Ther 5: 355–66
Lind M, Svensson AM, Kosiborod M et al (2014) Glycemic control and excess mortality in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 371: 1972–82
Mathieu C, Dandona P, Gillard P et al; DEPICT-2 investigators (2018) Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes (the DEPICT-2 study): 24-week results from a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 41: 1938–46
McKnight JA, Wild SH, Lamb MJ et al (2015) Glycaemic control of type 1 diabetes in clinical practice early in the 21st century: an international comparison. Diabet Med 32: 1036–50
Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW et al; T1D Exchange Clinic Network (2015) Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 38: 971–8
NICE (2015) Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management [NG17]. Updated July 2016. NICE, London. Available at: (accessed 23.11.20)
Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ (2011) Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ 343: d3805
Wolfsdorf JI, Ratner RE (2019) SGLT inhibitors for type 1 diabetes: proceed with extreme caution. Diabetes Care 42: 991–3

Related content
Genetic insights into type 2 diabetes and some cancers
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals


By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.