COVID-19 infection is associated with an increased risk and excess burden of new cardiovascular events at 12 months, even amongst those not hospitalised with the acute infection. For each of the pre-specified cardiovascular conditions explored, a gradient of risk was identified, depending on the severity of the acute infection and whether the person was hospitalised or required admission to an intensive care unit. The estimated excess risk of any cardiovascular outcome when comparing the COVID-19 cohort with the contemporary control cohort was 1.63, with an excess burden of 45.29 events per 1000 people, and an excess burden of major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI or stroke) of 23.48 per 1000. Care pathways for those surviving COVID-19 infection should include review and assessment for cardiovascular conditions, even if not hospitalised during the acute infection.
Although cardiovascular (CV) problems have been well described during acute COVID-19 infection, CV complications following the acute infection have not yet been clearly documented, since previous studies only looked at those hospitalised, explored a small range of CV events and had short follow-up times. The study by Xie and colleagues (2022), using the US Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare database, identified 153,760 people with acute COVID-19 infection between March 2020 and January 2021 who survived at least 30 days, and identified risk of a range of new, pre-specified, CV events occurring in the 12 months post infection, with data collated depending on the severity of the acute infection and whether hospitalised or requiring intensive care input.
The risk of the pre-specified CV events in those suffering COVID-19 were compared with the risk in the two control cohorts not known to have had COVID-19 – a contemporary cohort of more than 5.6 million controls and a historical cohort of more than 5.8 million controls from 2017, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The absolute excess burden of CV conditions per 1000 people at 12 months was calculated by comparing estimated incidence rates in the COVID-19 and contemporary control cohorts.
Risks and 12-month excess burdens for a selection of the conditions are shown in Table 1. The increased risk was demonstrated irrespective of age, sex and a range of CV disease risk factors (e.g. obesity, hypertension, CKD and hyperlipidaemia), with or without diabetes, even in those with no known CV disease prior to COVID-19 and, importantly, including those not hospitalised during the acute infection. Risks and excess burdens were consistent when compared with the historical control cohort rather than the contemporary cohort, suggesting the increased CV risks relate specifically to infection with COVID-19 and not to any other condition associated with the pandemic time period.
Of the COVID-19 cohort, 131,612 were managed in the community, 16,761 were hospitalised and 5388 were admitted to intensive care. When compared to the contemporary controls, there was a graded increase in both the risk and the excess burden at 12 months from non-hospitalised, through hospitalised, to those requiring intensive care. This occurred in each of the pre-specified CV conditions.
Multiple possible mechanisms have been postulated, including persisting damage to cardiomyocytes or endothelial damage, complement-activated changes in coagulopathy, dysregulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system or persisting increased immune response.
As with the similar paper examining the incidence of new type 2 diabetes (Xie and Al-Aly, 2022; discussed previously in Diabetes Distilled), although the excess burdens per 1000 people may initially appear small, when we consider the millions who have suffered COVID-19 in the UK, the excess burden on survivors and workload is likely to be very considerable.
Limitations of the study include the predominantly male, Caucasian cohort in the Veterans Affairs database. Some of the contemporary cohort may have had undiagnosed COVID-19 infection, but this would be expected to reduce, rather than increase, the comparative risks and burdens between the COVID-19 and control cohorts. The evolving COVID-19 virus variants and impact of vaccination may affect the likelihood of CV outcomes following COVID-19 infection.
We already aim to optimise CV risk in people with diabetes, so should consider previous COVID-19 as an additional CV risk factor in future.
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals
Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals
By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.
Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.
We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.
Diabetes &
Primary Care
Issue:
Vol:24 | No:03
Diabetes Distilled: COVID-19 infection and long-term cardiovascular outcomes
Although cardiovascular (CV) problems have been well described during acute COVID-19 infection, CV complications following the acute infection have not yet been clearly documented, since previous studies only looked at those hospitalised, explored a small range of CV events and had short follow-up times. The study by Xie and colleagues (2022), using the US Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare database, identified 153,760 people with acute COVID-19 infection between March 2020 and January 2021 who survived at least 30 days, and identified risk of a range of new, pre-specified, CV events occurring in the 12 months post infection, with data collated depending on the severity of the acute infection and whether hospitalised or requiring intensive care input.
The risk of the pre-specified CV events in those suffering COVID-19 were compared with the risk in the two control cohorts not known to have had COVID-19 – a contemporary cohort of more than 5.6 million controls and a historical cohort of more than 5.8 million controls from 2017, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The absolute excess burden of CV conditions per 1000 people at 12 months was calculated by comparing estimated incidence rates in the COVID-19 and contemporary control cohorts.
Risks and 12-month excess burdens for a selection of the conditions are shown in Table 1. The increased risk was demonstrated irrespective of age, sex and a range of CV disease risk factors (e.g. obesity, hypertension, CKD and hyperlipidaemia), with or without diabetes, even in those with no known CV disease prior to COVID-19 and, importantly, including those not hospitalised during the acute infection. Risks and excess burdens were consistent when compared with the historical control cohort rather than the contemporary cohort, suggesting the increased CV risks relate specifically to infection with COVID-19 and not to any other condition associated with the pandemic time period.
Of the COVID-19 cohort, 131,612 were managed in the community, 16,761 were hospitalised and 5388 were admitted to intensive care. When compared to the contemporary controls, there was a graded increase in both the risk and the excess burden at 12 months from non-hospitalised, through hospitalised, to those requiring intensive care. This occurred in each of the pre-specified CV conditions.
Multiple possible mechanisms have been postulated, including persisting damage to cardiomyocytes or endothelial damage, complement-activated changes in coagulopathy, dysregulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system or persisting increased immune response.
As with the similar paper examining the incidence of new type 2 diabetes (Xie and Al-Aly, 2022; discussed previously in Diabetes Distilled), although the excess burdens per 1000 people may initially appear small, when we consider the millions who have suffered COVID-19 in the UK, the excess burden on survivors and workload is likely to be very considerable.
Limitations of the study include the predominantly male, Caucasian cohort in the Veterans Affairs database. Some of the contemporary cohort may have had undiagnosed COVID-19 infection, but this would be expected to reduce, rather than increase, the comparative risks and burdens between the COVID-19 and control cohorts. The evolving COVID-19 virus variants and impact of vaccination may affect the likelihood of CV outcomes following COVID-19 infection.
We already aim to optimise CV risk in people with diabetes, so should consider previous COVID-19 as an additional CV risk factor in future.
Click here to read the study in full.
Xie Y, Al-Aly Z (2022) Risks and burdens of incident diabetes in long COVID: a cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 10: 311–21
Xie Y, Xu E, Bowe B, Al-Aly Z (2022) Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med 28: 583–90
Prescribing pearls: A guide to pioglitazone
Diabetes Distilled: Diabetes remission in the real world
Hypertension case finding and treatment to target as part of the NHS diabetes eye screening programme
Q&A: Lipid management – Part 3: Triglycerides and use of non-statin drugs
Diabetes Distilled: Impact of metformin timing on glucose and GLP-1 response
Diabetes Distilled: Diabetes-related foot ulcers – detailed advice for primary care
Conference over coffee: Diabetes and obesity within multiple long-term conditions
Understanding pioglitazone: The essential information in one place.
3 Sep 2024
Early data from the NHS Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission programme show it is effective in achieving remission at scale outside of clinical trials.
3 Sep 2024
A pathway offering opportunistic blood pressure checks during eye screening to support hypertension case finding and follow-up.
29 Aug 2024
Claire Davies answers questions on triglycerides and non-statin drugs.
22 Aug 2024