This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Disparities in medication prescribing between men and women with type 2 diabetes

Women are less likely to receive treatment with statins and RAS blockers when they are needed.

The aim of this study was to determine whether there were sex disparities in treatment among men and women with type 2 diabetes treated in primary care in the Netherlands. Differences were evaluated according to a comprehensive set of prescribing quality indicators covering blood glucose, blood pressure, lipids and albuminuria, and detailing whether medications were prescribed when needed, timely initiation and escalation, and medication safety.

A total of 10 456 participants were evaluated, of whom 47% were female. Women tended to be older, with a longer diabetes duration, higher BMI, lower eGFR and more commonly LDL-cholesterol levels over 2.5 mmol/L. Conversely, men were more likely to have albuminuria and a history of cardiovascular disease.

Regarding prevalent and first-line medications, women were less likely to be receiving ongoing therapy with metformin (odds ratio [OR], 0.70), statins (OR, 0.80), and RAS blockers for blood pressure (OR, 0.55) or for albuminuria (OR, 0.64). They were also less likely to initiate statin therapy when needed (OR, 0.75). No sex disparities were seen in terms of medication safety.

The fact that there were no significant sex differences in terms of starting metformin or RAS blockers, but that women were less likely to receive ongoing treatment with these agents, might be explained by greater rates of adverse reactions to these therapies in women. However, the authors propose that the lower rates of statin initiation and continuation are likely to be explained at least partly by clinical inertia.

The authors conclude that it is concerning that women are less likely to receive treatment with statins and RAS blockers when they are needed, and that this may partially explain the previously observed excess risk of cardiovascular and renal complications in women compared to men with type 2 diabetes (Peters et al, 2014a; 2014b; Shen et al, 2017).

Click here to read the study in full.

REFERENCES:

Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M (2014a) Diabetes as a risk factor for stroke in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts, including 775,385 individuals and 12,539 strokes. Lancet 383: 1973–80

Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M (2014b) Diabetes as risk factor for incident coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 coronary events. Diabetologia 57: 1542–51

Shen Y, Cai R, Sun J et al (2017) Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for incident chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 55: 66–76

Related content
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.