The use of HbA1c as a diagnostic test for diabetes was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2011) early last year, and after much delay, consensus guidance is now available (John et al, 2011). This should make identification of type 2 diabetes easier, as the test does not require fasting and can be taken at any time of day.
The advantage of early diagnosis of diabetes is that individuals are able to access treatment and education before they develop complications. These individuals are easier to treat, often managing just with lifestyle changes for a significant period of time. It will also have a favourable effect on attainment of QOF indicators for HbA1c as the practice will have a greater proportion of people with diabetes who can achieve tight targets safely.
Can we, therefore, now throw away the cumbersome, time-consuming, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)? Although the use of HbA1c is likely to become the main method of diagnosis, there are a number of situations in which it is not recommended and the traditional methods should be used, including OGTT (Table 1).
Despite its approval for use in the UK, HbA1c as a diagnostic tool has not been agreed with all laboratories so some practices will not be able to use this method to diagnose diabetes if their local laboratory facilities are not offering this service. Also, point-of-care HbA1c testing is not recommended unless it meets stringent quality assurance requirements. As HbA1c is a reflection of the previous 12 weeks’ blood glucose levels, it should not be used to diagnose diabetes with acute onset of symptoms (suggesting type 1 diabetes). This is because it may not have reached the diagnostic cut point (≥48 mmol/mol [≥6.5%]) even though the individual has high blood glucose levels. Any condition that includes abnormalities of haemoglobin, severe anaemia (<8 g/dL) or alteration in red blood cell turnover will mean HbA1c as a diagnostic tool will be unreliable. It should also not be used to diagnose gestational diabetes.
Where HbA1c is not recommended, testing for diabetes should be performed using either a fasting or random blood glucose using a venous sample (Table 2). A fasting blood glucose between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L should lead to a 75 g oral glucose challenge to confirm or exclude diabetes. Gestational diabetes should only be diagnosed using an OGTT (NICE, 2008). Table 3 looks at how to interpret OGTT results.
The WHO has not recommended the use of HbA1c in identifying people at high risk of diabetes (often termed “pre-diabetes”) although an HbA1c of between 42 and 47 mmol/mol (6.0 and 6.4%) may suggest this. Formal identification of impaired glucose tolerance will still require an OGTT. In the increasingly litigious NHS, there may still be a place for the OGTT as the gold standard in the formal diagnosis of diabetes.
The use of HbA1c as a diagnostic test for diabetes was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2011) early last year, and after much delay, consensus guidance is now available (John et al, 2011). This should make identification of type 2 diabetes easier, as the test does not require fasting and can be taken at any time of day.
The advantage of early diagnosis of diabetes is that individuals are able to access treatment and education before they develop complications. These individuals are easier to treat, often managing just with lifestyle changes for a significant period of time. It will also have a favourable effect on attainment of QOF indicators for HbA1c as the practice will have a greater proportion of people with diabetes who can achieve tight targets safely.
Can we, therefore, now throw away the cumbersome, time-consuming, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)? Although the use of HbA1c is likely to become the main method of diagnosis, there are a number of situations in which it is not recommended and the traditional methods should be used, including OGTT (Table 1).
Despite its approval for use in the UK, HbA1c as a diagnostic tool has not been agreed with all laboratories so some practices will not be able to use this method to diagnose diabetes if their local laboratory facilities are not offering this service. Also, point-of-care HbA1c testing is not recommended unless it meets stringent quality assurance requirements. As HbA1c is a reflection of the previous 12 weeks’ blood glucose levels, it should not be used to diagnose diabetes with acute onset of symptoms (suggesting type 1 diabetes). This is because it may not have reached the diagnostic cut point (≥48 mmol/mol [≥6.5%]) even though the individual has high blood glucose levels. Any condition that includes abnormalities of haemoglobin, severe anaemia (<8 g/dL) or alteration in red blood cell turnover will mean HbA1c as a diagnostic tool will be unreliable. It should also not be used to diagnose gestational diabetes.
Where HbA1c is not recommended, testing for diabetes should be performed using either a fasting or random blood glucose using a venous sample (Table 2). A fasting blood glucose between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L should lead to a 75 g oral glucose challenge to confirm or exclude diabetes. Gestational diabetes should only be diagnosed using an OGTT (NICE, 2008). Table 3 looks at how to interpret OGTT results.
The WHO has not recommended the use of HbA1c in identifying people at high risk of diabetes (often termed “pre-diabetes”) although an HbA1c of between 42 and 47 mmol/mol (6.0 and 6.4%) may suggest this. Formal identification of impaired glucose tolerance will still require an OGTT. In the increasingly litigious NHS, there may still be a place for the OGTT as the gold standard in the formal diagnosis of diabetes.
Diabetes &
Primary Care
Issue:
Vol:14 | No:01
Can we retire the oral glucose tolerance test?
The use of HbA1c as a diagnostic test for diabetes was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2011) early last year, and after much delay, consensus guidance is now available (John et al, 2011). This should make identification of type 2 diabetes easier, as the test does not require fasting and can be taken at any time of day.
The advantage of early diagnosis of diabetes is that individuals are able to access treatment and education before they develop complications. These individuals are easier to treat, often managing just with lifestyle changes for a significant period of time. It will also have a favourable effect on attainment of QOF indicators for HbA1c as the practice will have a greater proportion of people with diabetes who can achieve tight targets safely.
Can we, therefore, now throw away the cumbersome, time-consuming, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)? Although the use of HbA1c is likely to become the main method of diagnosis, there are a number of situations in which it is not recommended and the traditional methods should be used, including OGTT (Table 1).
Despite its approval for use in the UK, HbA1c as a diagnostic tool has not been agreed with all laboratories so some practices will not be able to use this method to diagnose diabetes if their local laboratory facilities are not offering this service. Also, point-of-care HbA1c testing is not recommended unless it meets stringent quality assurance requirements. As HbA1c is a reflection of the previous 12 weeks’ blood glucose levels, it should not be used to diagnose diabetes with acute onset of symptoms (suggesting type 1 diabetes). This is because it may not have reached the diagnostic cut point (≥48 mmol/mol [≥6.5%]) even though the individual has high blood glucose levels. Any condition that includes abnormalities of haemoglobin, severe anaemia (<8 g/dL) or alteration in red blood cell turnover will mean HbA1c as a diagnostic tool will be unreliable. It should also not be used to diagnose gestational diabetes.
Where HbA1c is not recommended, testing for diabetes should be performed using either a fasting or random blood glucose using a venous sample (Table 2). A fasting blood glucose between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L should lead to a 75 g oral glucose challenge to confirm or exclude diabetes. Gestational diabetes should only be diagnosed using an OGTT (NICE, 2008). Table 3 looks at how to interpret OGTT results.
The WHO has not recommended the use of HbA1c in identifying people at high risk of diabetes (often termed “pre-diabetes”) although an HbA1c of between 42 and 47 mmol/mol (6.0 and 6.4%) may suggest this. Formal identification of impaired glucose tolerance will still require an OGTT. In the increasingly litigious NHS, there may still be a place for the OGTT as the gold standard in the formal diagnosis of diabetes.
The use of HbA1c as a diagnostic test for diabetes was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2011) early last year, and after much delay, consensus guidance is now available (John et al, 2011). This should make identification of type 2 diabetes easier, as the test does not require fasting and can be taken at any time of day.
The advantage of early diagnosis of diabetes is that individuals are able to access treatment and education before they develop complications. These individuals are easier to treat, often managing just with lifestyle changes for a significant period of time. It will also have a favourable effect on attainment of QOF indicators for HbA1c as the practice will have a greater proportion of people with diabetes who can achieve tight targets safely.
Can we, therefore, now throw away the cumbersome, time-consuming, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)? Although the use of HbA1c is likely to become the main method of diagnosis, there are a number of situations in which it is not recommended and the traditional methods should be used, including OGTT (Table 1).
Despite its approval for use in the UK, HbA1c as a diagnostic tool has not been agreed with all laboratories so some practices will not be able to use this method to diagnose diabetes if their local laboratory facilities are not offering this service. Also, point-of-care HbA1c testing is not recommended unless it meets stringent quality assurance requirements. As HbA1c is a reflection of the previous 12 weeks’ blood glucose levels, it should not be used to diagnose diabetes with acute onset of symptoms (suggesting type 1 diabetes). This is because it may not have reached the diagnostic cut point (≥48 mmol/mol [≥6.5%]) even though the individual has high blood glucose levels. Any condition that includes abnormalities of haemoglobin, severe anaemia (<8 g/dL) or alteration in red blood cell turnover will mean HbA1c as a diagnostic tool will be unreliable. It should also not be used to diagnose gestational diabetes.
Where HbA1c is not recommended, testing for diabetes should be performed using either a fasting or random blood glucose using a venous sample (Table 2). A fasting blood glucose between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L should lead to a 75 g oral glucose challenge to confirm or exclude diabetes. Gestational diabetes should only be diagnosed using an OGTT (NICE, 2008). Table 3 looks at how to interpret OGTT results.
The WHO has not recommended the use of HbA1c in identifying people at high risk of diabetes (often termed “pre-diabetes”) although an HbA1c of between 42 and 47 mmol/mol (6.0 and 6.4%) may suggest this. Formal identification of impaired glucose tolerance will still require an OGTT. In the increasingly litigious NHS, there may still be a place for the OGTT as the gold standard in the formal diagnosis of diabetes.
John WG, Hillson R, Alberti G (2011) Use of HbA1c in the diagnosis of diabetes: The implementation of WHO guidance 2011. Diabetes & Primary Care 13: 333–4
NICE (2008) Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and its Complications from Pre-conception to the Post-natal Period. Clinical Guideline 63. NICE, London. Available at: http://bit.ly/y8Snpu (accessed 07.02.12)
World Health Organization (2011) Use of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. Abbreviated Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO, Geneva. Available at: http://bit.ly/seLcYT (accessed 07.02.11)
Conference over coffee: Diabetes and obesity initiatives, multiple long-term condition management and the bookends of pregnancy
Scottish Government and NHS Scotland consensus statement on GLP-1-based therapies for obesity
Editorial: Type 2 diabetes, CVD, CKD, dementia and health inequality: Adopting a preventative approach
The dialysis timebomb: Why preventing kidney disease is everyone’s responsibility
Conference over coffee: Oncology, end-of-life care, psychology and insulin dilemmas
How to follow up gestational diabetes
Prescribing pearls: A guide to pioglitazone
Bite-size practice points from the 2024 PCDS National Conference.
22 Nov 2024
Scotland-wide advice to inform the process of making injectable weight management drugs available and to prevent variation between Health Boards.
14 Nov 2024
Jane Diggle discusses points for our practice that can help prevent all of these conditions, as well as improve equity of care.
13 Nov 2024
The key role of primary care in avoiding a four-fold increase in the number of people needing dialysis by 2035.
13 Nov 2024