Let’s adopt a Buddhist approach to this Diabetes Digest. In short, let’s define the problem and outline what we can specially do in clinical practice to address health inequalities, both pragmatically and practically.
The research study by Vicks et al (2022) consisted of a population of over 373 000 people aged 45–64 years (click here to read the Digest). Four distinct ethnic groups were looked at. The reference group was non-Hispanic White people, while the comparison groups were Chinese, Filipino and South Asian. Across all weight categories, diabetes prevalence was higher for Asians overall than White adults, and within the Asian groups it was highest for Filipino and South Asian adults. In the South Asian group, compared to the White reference group, prevalence ratios for men/women at a healthy BMI were 1.8/2.8 for prediabetes and 5.9/8.0 for diabetes, respectively.
Then there are the sex disparities identified by Ambroz et al (2022; click here to read the Digest). They found that, in the context of treating hypertension with multiple agents or if microalbuminuria was present, females were less likely to be treated with a RAAS inhibitor, such as ramipril or losartan, than males (81.9% vs 89.3%). Statin therapy was a quarter less likely to be commenced in females than in males (19.7% vs 24.7%).
Finally, and as expected, Gardner et al (2022) provide further evidence on the role of deprivation and its association with increased progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes (click here to read the Digest). The increased risk associated with deprivation was at least 17%, with South Asian and mixed-race ethnicities carrying an additional risk of progression of 31% and 22%, respectively.
What are the solutions?
So, how to solve these inequalities? Not all glucose-lowering drugs are equal (although when sitagliptin becomes generic, I plan to use it: any way to lower HbA1c that little bit more and reduce progression to insulin therapy). In the study by Mannucci et al (2022), all the main glucose-lowering drug classes were investigated as to their potential to improve diabetes outcomes (click here to read the Digest). The principal outcomes included all-cause mortality, 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF). Doubling of serum creatinine, worsening albuminuria and renal death were considered as secondary endpoints. A large total of 255 randomised controlled trials were analysed.
GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality (12% and 15%, respectively) and MACE (11% and 10%). SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with reduced risk of HHF by 32%, worsening albuminuria by 33% and doubling of serum creatinine by 32%. Metformin and pioglitazone were associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE, by 40% and 15%, respectively. However, pioglitazone was associated with a 30% higher risk of HHF. Insulin secretagogues were associated with an increased risk in all-cause mortality by 12% and in MACE by 19%.
In the CAPTURE study by Østergaard et al (2022), there was a distinct increase in life expectancy associated with optimised cardiovascular risk reduction using, for example, statins and RAAS inhibitors (click here to read the Digest). The lifetime benefit from optimal risk management was 3.9 years and 1.3 years in patients with and without established cardiovascular disease, respectively. Further addition of an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist in patients with cardiovascular disease gave an additional mean lifetime benefit of 1.2 years.
All in all, with the evidence summarised, we have the potential to add around 1–5 years of relatively healthy life to our patients. This is an average: some might gain less but others could gain more than a decade. The pragmatic solution, then, is that, after reinforcing advice on healthy lifestyle, most of our patients with type 2 diabetes will need to take the RAAS inhibitor, the statin and the SGLT2 inhibitor.
Diabetes Digest
Issue:
Early View
Reducing health inequality: A simple step for the practising clinician to take
Let’s adopt a Buddhist approach to this Diabetes Digest. In short, let’s define the problem and outline what we can specially do in clinical practice to address health inequalities, both pragmatically and practically.
The research study by Vicks et al (2022) consisted of a population of over 373 000 people aged 45–64 years (click here to read the Digest). Four distinct ethnic groups were looked at. The reference group was non-Hispanic White people, while the comparison groups were Chinese, Filipino and South Asian. Across all weight categories, diabetes prevalence was higher for Asians overall than White adults, and within the Asian groups it was highest for Filipino and South Asian adults. In the South Asian group, compared to the White reference group, prevalence ratios for men/women at a healthy BMI were 1.8/2.8 for prediabetes and 5.9/8.0 for diabetes, respectively.
Then there are the sex disparities identified by Ambroz et al (2022; click here to read the Digest). They found that, in the context of treating hypertension with multiple agents or if microalbuminuria was present, females were less likely to be treated with a RAAS inhibitor, such as ramipril or losartan, than males (81.9% vs 89.3%). Statin therapy was a quarter less likely to be commenced in females than in males (19.7% vs 24.7%).
Finally, and as expected, Gardner et al (2022) provide further evidence on the role of deprivation and its association with increased progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes (click here to read the Digest). The increased risk associated with deprivation was at least 17%, with South Asian and mixed-race ethnicities carrying an additional risk of progression of 31% and 22%, respectively.
What are the solutions?
So, how to solve these inequalities? Not all glucose-lowering drugs are equal (although when sitagliptin becomes generic, I plan to use it: any way to lower HbA1c that little bit more and reduce progression to insulin therapy). In the study by Mannucci et al (2022), all the main glucose-lowering drug classes were investigated as to their potential to improve diabetes outcomes (click here to read the Digest). The principal outcomes included all-cause mortality, 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF). Doubling of serum creatinine, worsening albuminuria and renal death were considered as secondary endpoints. A large total of 255 randomised controlled trials were analysed.
GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality (12% and 15%, respectively) and MACE (11% and 10%). SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with reduced risk of HHF by 32%, worsening albuminuria by 33% and doubling of serum creatinine by 32%. Metformin and pioglitazone were associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE, by 40% and 15%, respectively. However, pioglitazone was associated with a 30% higher risk of HHF. Insulin secretagogues were associated with an increased risk in all-cause mortality by 12% and in MACE by 19%.
In the CAPTURE study by Østergaard et al (2022), there was a distinct increase in life expectancy associated with optimised cardiovascular risk reduction using, for example, statins and RAAS inhibitors (click here to read the Digest). The lifetime benefit from optimal risk management was 3.9 years and 1.3 years in patients with and without established cardiovascular disease, respectively. Further addition of an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist in patients with cardiovascular disease gave an additional mean lifetime benefit of 1.2 years.
All in all, with the evidence summarised, we have the potential to add around 1–5 years of relatively healthy life to our patients. This is an average: some might gain less but others could gain more than a decade. The pragmatic solution, then, is that, after reinforcing advice on healthy lifestyle, most of our patients with type 2 diabetes will need to take the RAAS inhibitor, the statin and the SGLT2 inhibitor.
Ambroz M, Geelink M, Smits KPJ et al (2022) Sex disparities in medication prescribing amongst patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus managed in primary care. Diabet Med 24 Oct: e14987 [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14987
Gardner MP, Wang J, Hazlehurst JM et al (2022) Risk of progression from pre-diabetes to type 2 diabetes in a large UK adult cohort. Diabet Med 29 Oct: e14996 [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14996
Mannucci E, Gallo M, Giaccari A et al; SID-AMD joint panel for Italian Guidelines on Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes (2022) Effects of glucose-lowering agents on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with external adjudication of events. Diabetes Obes Metab 7 Oct [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14888
Østergaard HB, Humphreys V, Hengeveld EM et al; CAPTURE investigators (2022) Cardiovascular risk and lifetime benefit from preventive treatment in type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the CAPTURE study. Diabetes Obes Metab 5 Oct [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14887
Vicks WS, Lo JC, Guo L et al (2022) Prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes vary by ethnicity among U.S. Asian adults at healthy weight, overweight, and obesity ranges: an electronic health record study. BMC Public Health 22: 1954. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14362-8
Type 2 diabetes: Reframing the first stage of care
A low-carbohydrate weight-loss intervention: 8-year practice service evaluation
Effect of weight change on remission in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
Healthy versus unhealthy plant-based diets: How do they affect type 2 diabetes risk?
Cumulative glycaemic exposure and cardiovascular risk
Look AHEAD: Intensive lifestyle intervention less effective in those with higher HbA1c
New kids on the block: Friend or Foe?
Attempts to achieve remission, or at least a substantial improvement in glycaemic control, should be the initial focus at type 2 diabetes diagnosis.
9 May 2024
A low-carbohydrate intervention should be offered early in the diabetes journey, and before HbA1c rises too high, to maximise the odds of remission.
9 May 2024
Weight loss in the early stage of type 2 diabetes has an important effect on the prognosis.
9 May 2024
Not all plant-based diets are born equal for preventing type 2 diabetes.
9 May 2024