This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Pre-conception planned pregnancy improves glycaemic control in women with diabetes

Jean Saunders
, James O’Hare
, John Slevin
, Yvonne Moloney

The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH, 2005) revealed that the baby of a woman with pre-gestational diabetes is five times more likely to be stillborn, three times more likely to die in the first month of life, the baby is twice as likely to have a congenital malformation and is twice as likely to be over 4 kg. Recommendations included pre-conception services, multidisciplinary care and improving care for women with type 2 diabetes (CEMACH, 2007).

Aim and methodology
The aim of this audit was to collect information on outcomes of diabetes in pregnancy to highlight the areas where improvements are feasible using our current resources. Retrospective data were collected on 100 pregnancies. The data presented here are an extract from an Abracadabra Diabetes Nursing Conference Award entry.

Results
Of the 100 women audited (mean age 31 years), 63 had type 1 diabetes and 37 had type 2 diabetes. Thirty-eight per cent attended the clinical midwife specialist-led pre-conception care clinic and 44% took pre-pregnancy folic acid 5 mg. 

HbA1c levels on first appointment (booking) were significantly different between the two groups: 7% (53 mmol/mol) for women with type 1 diabetes and 6.7% (50 mmol/mol) for those with type 2 diabetes (P=0.035). Mean HbA1c level on booking for those who attended for pre-conception care was 6.6% (49 mmol/mol) compared with 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) for those who did not attend. Median HbA1c level at delivery was 6.1% (43 mmol/mol). 

There was no statistically significant association between birth weight and HbA1c level on booking (P=0.51) or at delivery (P=0.183). A total of 35% of women had a vaginal delivery and 42% had a caesarean section (national background caesarian section rate 28%; National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre [NPEC], 2008).

Live births accounted for 74% of deliveries. Twenty-three per cent were miscarriages, which is similar to the national background rate, and 3% were stillbirths (national background rate 0.5%; NPEC, 2008); there were no neonatal deaths (national background rate 0.4%; NPEC, 2008). Neither the 21% incidence of macrosomia (birth weight >4 kg; P=0.157) or median birth weight of 3440 g (P=0.088) were significantly different between women with type 1 or 2 diabetes.

Conclusion 
This cohort of women achieved reasonable HbA1c levels before attending for pre-conception care and the majority achieved good glycaemic control with conventional insulin treatment. In this audit, women who participated in pre-conception planned pregnancy achieved better glycaemic control.

The authors recommened that the number of women with type 1 or 2 diabetes attending for pre-conception care should be increased; that pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes should be encouraged to book for antenatal care before 8 weeks gestation; and that caesarian section rates should be further reduced.

The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH, 2005) revealed that the baby of a woman with pre-gestational diabetes is five times more likely to be stillborn, three times more likely to die in the first month of life, the baby is twice as likely to have a congenital malformation and is twice as likely to be over 4 kg. Recommendations included pre-conception services, multidisciplinary care and improving care for women with type 2 diabetes (CEMACH, 2007).

Aim and methodology
The aim of this audit was to collect information on outcomes of diabetes in pregnancy to highlight the areas where improvements are feasible using our current resources. Retrospective data were collected on 100 pregnancies. The data presented here are an extract from an Abracadabra Diabetes Nursing Conference Award entry.

Results
Of the 100 women audited (mean age 31 years), 63 had type 1 diabetes and 37 had type 2 diabetes. Thirty-eight per cent attended the clinical midwife specialist-led pre-conception care clinic and 44% took pre-pregnancy folic acid 5 mg. 

HbA1c levels on first appointment (booking) were significantly different between the two groups: 7% (53 mmol/mol) for women with type 1 diabetes and 6.7% (50 mmol/mol) for those with type 2 diabetes (P=0.035). Mean HbA1c level on booking for those who attended for pre-conception care was 6.6% (49 mmol/mol) compared with 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) for those who did not attend. Median HbA1c level at delivery was 6.1% (43 mmol/mol). 

There was no statistically significant association between birth weight and HbA1c level on booking (P=0.51) or at delivery (P=0.183). A total of 35% of women had a vaginal delivery and 42% had a caesarean section (national background caesarian section rate 28%; National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre [NPEC], 2008).

Live births accounted for 74% of deliveries. Twenty-three per cent were miscarriages, which is similar to the national background rate, and 3% were stillbirths (national background rate 0.5%; NPEC, 2008); there were no neonatal deaths (national background rate 0.4%; NPEC, 2008). Neither the 21% incidence of macrosomia (birth weight >4 kg; P=0.157) or median birth weight of 3440 g (P=0.088) were significantly different between women with type 1 or 2 diabetes.

Conclusion 
This cohort of women achieved reasonable HbA1c levels before attending for pre-conception care and the majority achieved good glycaemic control with conventional insulin treatment. In this audit, women who participated in pre-conception planned pregnancy achieved better glycaemic control.

The authors recommened that the number of women with type 1 or 2 diabetes attending for pre-conception care should be increased; that pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes should be encouraged to book for antenatal care before 8 weeks gestation; and that caesarian section rates should be further reduced.

REFERENCES:

Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2005) Pregnancy in Women with Type 1 and 2 Diabetes in 2002–2003. CEMACH, London
Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2007) Diabetes in Pregnancy: Are We Providing the Best Care? Executive Summary. CEMACH, London
National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre (2008) Perinatal Mortality Report. NPEC, Cork, Ireland

Related content
The GIRFT return on investment tool and the role of diabetes inpatient specialist nurses
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.