This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Perceptions of HbA 1c in people with diabetes: A barrier to improving control?

As a backdrop to the IMPROVE™ Control campaign, in this issue we bring you illuminating results from a recent survey of people with diabetes receiving insulin therapy. The survey, which was commissioned by Novo Nordisk, explored the respondents’ attitudes toward information provision and their knowledge of HbA1c, with results for the latter being particularly enlightening.

Survey results
Overall, 10500 people with diabetes were invited to participate by mail in July and August 2008, and 3750 responses were analysed. Alarmingly, the data revealed that more than one-third of the people surveyed had not heard of the term “HbA1c” (Figure 1). Given this, it is not surprising that only half of the respondents reported that they know what HbA1c measures (Figure 2), and more than half of those surveyed did not know their current HbA1c level (Figure 3). Of those who did know their HbA1c, 52% reported a level that was ≤7.5%.

Clinical implications
One of the key messages from NICE’s 2008 guideline on the management of type 2 diabetes is that people with diabetes should be involved in making decisions about their target HbA1c level (National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions [NCCCC], 2008).

Furthermore, professionals were advised to “encourage the person to maintain their individual target unless the resulting side effects (including hypoglycaemia) or their efforts to achieve this impair their quality of life” (NCCCC, 2008).

The result that a substantial proportion of respondents in this survey reported that they have not heard of the term HbA1c, that they do not know what HbA1c represents, or that they do not know their current HbA1c level, may not be surprising to healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes. However, given NICE’s recommendations, these findings seem to be symptomatic of a key barrier to improving glycaemic control; there is clearly much work still to be done.

As a backdrop to the IMPROVE™ Control campaign, in this issue we bring you illuminating results from a recent survey of people with diabetes receiving insulin therapy. The survey, which was commissioned by Novo Nordisk, explored the respondents’ attitudes toward information provision and their knowledge of HbA1c, with results for the latter being particularly enlightening.

Survey results
Overall, 10500 people with diabetes were invited to participate by mail in July and August 2008, and 3750 responses were analysed. Alarmingly, the data revealed that more than one-third of the people surveyed had not heard of the term “HbA1c” (Figure 1). Given this, it is not surprising that only half of the respondents reported that they know what HbA1c measures (Figure 2), and more than half of those surveyed did not know their current HbA1c level (Figure 3). Of those who did know their HbA1c, 52% reported a level that was ≤7.5%.

Clinical implications
One of the key messages from NICE’s 2008 guideline on the management of type 2 diabetes is that people with diabetes should be involved in making decisions about their target HbA1c level (National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions [NCCCC], 2008).

Furthermore, professionals were advised to “encourage the person to maintain their individual target unless the resulting side effects (including hypoglycaemia) or their efforts to achieve this impair their quality of life” (NCCCC, 2008).

The result that a substantial proportion of respondents in this survey reported that they have not heard of the term HbA1c, that they do not know what HbA1c represents, or that they do not know their current HbA1c level, may not be surprising to healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes. However, given NICE’s recommendations, these findings seem to be symptomatic of a key barrier to improving glycaemic control; there is clearly much work still to be done.

REFERENCES:

National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (2008) Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update). Royal College of Physicians, London

Related content
Another year over – and here’s what we’ve done!
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.