This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Journal of
Diabetes Nursing

Issue:

Share this article

Achieving HbA 1c targets with patient satisfaction in community pharmacy

Soraya Dhillon
, Graham Phillips
, Paul Robinson
, Fabrizio Schifano
, Majid Ali

Community pharmacies represent a local and accessible public health network. As such they are well placed to be the first point of contact for people seeking help with undiagnosed symptoms as well as for the management of both acute and chronic disease. On average, people with diabetes will visit their community pharmacy three to eight times more frequently than other individuals (Pinto et al, 2006). Therefore, community pharmacies are potentially a prime source of diabetes education and care.

The 2005 Community Pharmacy Contract was a move towards recognising and remunerating community pharmacists’ extended roles in the optimisation of medicine and public health. Since then the profession has gathered ample evidence of improved outcomes for people with long-term conditions (Phelan et al, 2006; Al-Blowi et al, 2007; Morgan et al, 2007; James and Kumwenda, 2008). Significantly, patients have consistently reported high satisfaction levels with these extended services.

Pharmacists are now more involved in clinical care in a variety of ways, including counselling, reviewing medication and being independent prescribers. We have evaluated the effect of a diabetes education and counselling programme on diabetes control in a community pharmacy setting.

Method
Eligible patients (type 2 diabetes, HbA1c above 58 mmol/mol [7.5%] and without serious comorbidities; n=23) were enrolled on a diabetes education and counselling programme in two community pharmacies in Hertfordshire. Three community pharmacists were specifically trained by a diabetes consultant and a specialist nurse to provide enhanced care, including structured and individualised patient education and counselling about diabetes, its treatment, associated cardiovascular risk factors and diet restrictions. This included six appointments with the community pharmacist over a period of 12 months. An HbA1c target was individually set for each patient at the start of the programme, and was measured at two follow-up appointments (5 and 12 months). A service satisfaction survey via paper questionnaires was also employed half-way through the programme. A matched control group received routine clinical care.

Results
Twenty-one (91%) participants achieved their set HbA1c targets; mean HbA1c significantly reduced over 12 months (from 66 mmol/mol [8.2%] to 49 mmol/mol [6.6%], P<0.001) (Figure 1). Two individuals who could not meet their targets had baseline HbA1c of 53 mmol/mol (7.0%). 

Twenty participants (87%) responded to the service satisfaction survey. All 20 were fully satisfied with the flexibility in arranging the appointments, the length of time spent with the pharmacist and the information received from the pharmacist during each appointment. Eighteen participants (90%) thought that consultations with pharmacists improved their understanding of diabetes and medicines. All patients said that the service met their expectations. There were no negative comments. 

Conclusion
Education and counselling by community pharmacists can result in a significant improvement in diabetes control, with high levels of patient satisfaction. Comparison with the control group has demonstrated improvements in other clinical parameters (Ali et al, 2012). Given the current NHS changes and the increasing prevalence and cost of diabetes, it is even more important to consider the role of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions using the skills of community pharmacy teams.

Community pharmacies represent a local and accessible public health network. As such they are well placed to be the first point of contact for people seeking help with undiagnosed symptoms as well as for the management of both acute and chronic disease. On average, people with diabetes will visit their community pharmacy three to eight times more frequently than other individuals (Pinto et al, 2006). Therefore, community pharmacies are potentially a prime source of diabetes education and care.

The 2005 Community Pharmacy Contract was a move towards recognising and remunerating community pharmacists’ extended roles in the optimisation of medicine and public health. Since then the profession has gathered ample evidence of improved outcomes for people with long-term conditions (Phelan et al, 2006; Al-Blowi et al, 2007; Morgan et al, 2007; James and Kumwenda, 2008). Significantly, patients have consistently reported high satisfaction levels with these extended services.

Pharmacists are now more involved in clinical care in a variety of ways, including counselling, reviewing medication and being independent prescribers. We have evaluated the effect of a diabetes education and counselling programme on diabetes control in a community pharmacy setting.

Method
Eligible patients (type 2 diabetes, HbA1c above 58 mmol/mol [7.5%] and without serious comorbidities; n=23) were enrolled on a diabetes education and counselling programme in two community pharmacies in Hertfordshire. Three community pharmacists were specifically trained by a diabetes consultant and a specialist nurse to provide enhanced care, including structured and individualised patient education and counselling about diabetes, its treatment, associated cardiovascular risk factors and diet restrictions. This included six appointments with the community pharmacist over a period of 12 months. An HbA1c target was individually set for each patient at the start of the programme, and was measured at two follow-up appointments (5 and 12 months). A service satisfaction survey via paper questionnaires was also employed half-way through the programme. A matched control group received routine clinical care.

Results
Twenty-one (91%) participants achieved their set HbA1c targets; mean HbA1c significantly reduced over 12 months (from 66 mmol/mol [8.2%] to 49 mmol/mol [6.6%], P<0.001) (Figure 1). Two individuals who could not meet their targets had baseline HbA1c of 53 mmol/mol (7.0%). 

Twenty participants (87%) responded to the service satisfaction survey. All 20 were fully satisfied with the flexibility in arranging the appointments, the length of time spent with the pharmacist and the information received from the pharmacist during each appointment. Eighteen participants (90%) thought that consultations with pharmacists improved their understanding of diabetes and medicines. All patients said that the service met their expectations. There were no negative comments. 

Conclusion
Education and counselling by community pharmacists can result in a significant improvement in diabetes control, with high levels of patient satisfaction. Comparison with the control group has demonstrated improvements in other clinical parameters (Ali et al, 2012). Given the current NHS changes and the increasing prevalence and cost of diabetes, it is even more important to consider the role of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions using the skills of community pharmacy teams.

Related content
Improving care for people experiencing homelessness with diabetes
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.