This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

The Diabetic
Foot Journal

Digest 27-1: “An injection a day may keep CLI away?”

Neil Baker OBE

Welcome to another diabetic foot digest commentary. Hopefully there will be a few abstracts that may catch your interest. 

The focus paper is an open-label randomised controlled study from a group in Naples, Italy. Its main objective was to investigate the effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), on peripheral arterial perfusion, measured as peripheral transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) in individuals with type 2 diabetes and existing mild peripheral artery disease (PAD). The authors screened 89 subjects with type 2 diabetes with an HbA1c of 6.5–8% and PAD, recruiting 55 people. Inclusion criteria included GLP-1RA naïve or not taken for 3+ months, TcPO2 30–49 mmHg (foot dorsum). PAD diagnosis was determined by Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography, or angiography within 12 months. 

The authors randomised 27 subjects to target daily dose 1.8 mg of subcutaneous liraglutide titrated 0.6 mg weekly to target (LG) and 28 to control group (CG) for 6 months. Primary outcomes were a change from baseline TcPO2 between groups and proportional comparison of subjects who reached 10% increase from baseline TcPO2 in each group. 

The mean age was 67.5 (SD ± 8.5) years; 78% (n=43) were male. The median HbA1c was 6.9% (range 6.5–7.8%) and the mean TcPO2 was 40.3 (± 5.7) mmHg. 

The 10% increase of TcPO2 occurred in 24 participants (89%) in LG and 13 (46%) in CG (relative risk 1.91; 95% CI 1.26–2.90; p<0.001). However, overall, there was a TcPO2 increase at follow-up in both groups, but with a significant difference favouring the LG (difference of 11.2 mmHg; 95% CI 8.0–14.5 mmHg; p<0.001). Compared with CG, individuals in LG had a significant reduction of C-reactive protein (−0.4 mg/dl; 95% CI −0.7, −0.07; p=0.02), urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (−119.4 mg/g; 95% CI −195.0, −43.8; p=0.003), and improvement of 6-minute walking distance (25.1 m; 95% CI 21.8–28.3 m; p<0.001). 

There have been several previous studies indicating that GLP-1RAs have a potentially beneficial role in reducing PAD progression (SUSTAIN-6, EXSCEL and LEADER trials), but this study is the first to measure tissue perfusion which is important because it a physiological measurement of tissue oxygen levels. Of course, there are potential confounders of TcPO2,  namely oedema and inflammation. There was no account of these in the study design. 

There was no record of activity, which may explain the fact that both groups had an increase in TcPO2 levels by developing increased collateral supply. The study had a short follow-up period of only 6 months, a longer-term follow-up would be required to see if these results were sustained or changed. Additionally, the sample size was small, and being open labelled this study could be prone to high bias. It would also perhaps have benefitted from also using other comparative assessment methods e.g. waveform analysis, digital PPG, etc. 

However, this study suggests that perhaps liraglutide could be used to prevent the clinical progression of PAD in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

REFERENCES:

Caruso P, Maiorino MI, Longo M et al (2024)Liraglutide for lower limb perfusion in people with type 2 diabetes and peripheral artery disease: the STARDUST randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 4;7(3): e241545

Related content
Consensus document: Improving offloading for the foot in diabetes – Use of total contact casting in practice
Understanding personality traits: could this help us support better foot self-care behaviours in people with diabetes?
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.