This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

The Diabetic
Foot Journal

Consensus document: Improving offloading for the foot in diabetes – Use of total contact casting in practice

Jacqui Fletcher, Nichola Beard, Martin Fox, Krishna Gohil, Rebekah Nelson-Stanley, Christian Pankhurst, Mark Rees, Beth Tite

There are approximately 18.6 million people across the globe that are affected by a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) every year (Armstrong et al, 2023), underlining the significant burden placed on healthcare systems. The scale of the problem in the UK is amplified by the growing number of people with diabetes in the population (Diabetes UK, 2023). There are estimated to be more than 5 million people in the UK living with diabetes: over 4.3 million appear in Diabetes UK data as having diabetes, while a further 850,000 could be living in the UK with diabetes who are yet to have been diagnosed (Diabetes UK, 2023). DFUs have a major detrimental, long-term impact on morbidity and mortality rates, and an individual’s quality of life (Brownrigg et al, 2012).

In the UK, studies have shown that there are around 450,000 people with diabetes that develop a DFU at some point in their lives, which equates to approximately 10% of those diagnosed with diabetes (NHS North West Coast Strategic Clinical Network, 2017). In addition, some 7,000 diabetes-related amputations are performed every year in the UK. Time is of the essence when it comes to avoiding amputation in these individuals with DFUs, given that an estimated 17% of this patient cohort will have at least one amputation within 12 months from initial presentation with a foot ulcer (Guest et al, 2018).

The seriousness of the development of a DFU is starkly expressed by Armstrong et al (2007), explaining that individuals with lower-extremity complications of diabetes have 5-year mortality rates similar to or worse than most common types of cancer. From a UK perspective, there could be as many as 200,000 individuals with diabetes and foot ulcers that may not be alive in 5 years’ time and that over 5,500 patients with diabetes-related amputations each year have less than 5 years to live.

DFUs come with a considerable cost. The mean cost of the management of a DFU is £7,800, ranging from £2,140 to £8,800 per healed and unhealed DFU, respectively, and £16,900 per amputated wound (Guest et al, 2018). This translates to an annual NHS cost attributable to managing these DFUs standing at between £524.6 million and £728.0 million (Guest et al, 2018).

It is acknowledged that the prevention and treatment of DFU requires multidisciplinary management, and integral to this is the use of offloading. International guidance stresses the importance of offloading for people with diabetes and complex wounds: “Offloading mechanical tissue stress is arguably the most important of multiple interventions needed to heal diabetes‐related foot ulcers” (Bus et al, 2023).

For people with diabetes and a neuropathic plantar forefoot or midfoot ulcer, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) recommends that a non-removable knee-high offloading device be utilised (Bus et al, 2023). Described as the ‘gold-standard’ non-removable device, the total contact cast is used to redistribute pressure on the foot and can be used to treat DFUs. Despite the fact total contact casting (TCC) is the gold standard, the evidence points to the fact that it is not widely used. A range of reasons have been emphasised as to why this is the case, including a requirement for training and poor acceptance levels from patients (Boulton et al, 2018).

The IWGDF guidelines recommend use of a total contact cast or knee-high walker for individuals with diabetes and a neuropathic plantar forefoot or midfoot, based upon “local resources and the person’s individual factors and acceptability” (Bus et al, 2023). Despite the widespread recognition that total contact casts are the optimal device to take weight off of the foot in patients with DFUs, they are poorly utilised: it is estimated that just 5% of patients receive a load redistribution device (Guest et al, 2018). 

Of 895 diabetic foot centres in the US, just 1.7% used total contact casts for the majority of their DFU treatment (Wu et al, 2008), while the situation has been found to be less than ideal; the Eurodiale study examined 14 centres situated in 10 European nations and the take up of TCC was found to be 18% (Prompers et al, 2008).

To address this key issue directly, as well as a number of others, a group of experts convened for a round table meeting in London to develop this consensus document, focusing on the effective and appropriate use of TCC.

This consensus document aims to aid clinicians working with DFUs to:

  • Identify when TCC should be used and with which patient groups, highlighting red flags for consideration
  • Use standardised guides and pathways to support appropriate use of TCC (i.e. WiFi)
  • Identify what level of education is required for staff and how this should be provided
  • Look at ways to improve patient engagement, and the tools that are required to support this.

Resources, technical skill and availability of therapeutic load redistribution devices vary across the UK. The guidance in this consensus document is designed to equip clinicians to deal confidently with using TCC in practice. The overall aim is to enable more patients to receive gold-standard treatment, improving outcomes for patients and their quality of life.

This document is intended to be a continuation of the important work expressed in the Redefining and Demystifying Offloading for Diabetes Foot Care consensus document (Munro et al, 2021) and it is recommended reading for any individual seeking to gain expert guidance on the role of offloading in the care of the foot in diabetes. 

Jacqui Fletcher, Chair

Download the full consensus document below

REFERENCES:

Armstrong DG, Stacpoole-Shea S (1999) Total contact casts and removable cast walkers. Mitigation of plantar heel pressure. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 89(1): 50–3

Armstrong DG, Nguyen HC, Lavery LA et al (2001) Offloading the diabetic foot wound: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 24(6): 1019–22 doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.6.1019.

Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel HR et al (2003) Activity patterns of patients with diabetic foot ulcers: patients with active ulcers may not adhere to a standard pressure offloading regimen. Diabetes Care 26(9): 2595–7

Armstrong DG, Wrobel J, Robbins JM (2007) Guest editorial: are diabetes-related wounds and amputations worse than cancer? Int Wound J 4(4): 286–7

Armstrong D, Isaac A, Bevilacqua N, Wu S (2014) Offloading foot wounds in people with diabetes. Wounds 26(1): 13–20

Armstrong DG, Tan T-W, Boulton A (2023) Diabetic foot ulcers: a review. JAMA 330(1): 62–75. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.10578

Baker N, Osman IS (2016) The principles and practicalities of offloading diabetic foot ulcers. The Diabetic Foot Journal 19: 172–81

Barr L (2015) Diabetic foot ulceration: the implications of biomechanics on prevention and treatment. The Diabetic Foot Journal 18(3): 135–41

Blanchette V, Brousseau-Foley M, Cloutier L (2020) Effect of contact with podiatry in a team approach context on diabetic foot ulcer and lower extremity amputation: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 13(1): 15

Boulton AJM, Armstrong DG, Kirsner RS et al (2018) Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Foot Complications. Arlington (VA): American Diabetes Association

Brand PW (1991) The insensitive foot (including leprosy) (In.) Jahss M (ed.). Disorders of the Foot and Ankle. Philadelphia: Saunders: pp2170-2175

Brownrigg JR, Davey J, Holt PJ et al (2012) The association of ulceration of the foot with cardio vascular and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia 55(11): 2906-12

Bus SA, van Deursen RW, Armstrong DG et al (2015) Footwear and offloading interventons to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 32(Suppl 1): 99–118

Bus SA, van Netten JJ, Kottink AI et al (2018) The efficacy of removable devices to offload and heal neuropathic plantar forefoot ulcers in people with diabetes: a single-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J 15(1): 65–74

Bus SA, Armstrong DG, Gooday C et al (2020) Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 36(Suppl 1): e3274

Bus SA, Armstrong DG, Crews RT et al (2023) Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2023: e3647

Cavanagh PR, Bus SA (2010) Off-loading the diabetic foot for ulcer prevention and healing. J Vasc Surg 52: 37S–43S

Chadwick P (2021) Handling barriers to offloading the foot in patients with diabetes. The Diabetic Foot Journal 24(4): 6–12

Coleman WC, Brand PW, Birke JA (1984) The total contact cast. A therapy for plantar ulceration on insensitive feet. J Am Podiatry Assoc 74(11): 548–52

Diabetes UK (2023) How Many People in the UK Have Diabetes? London: Diabetes UK. Available at: https://www.diabetes.org.uk/about-us/about-the-charity/our-strategy/statistics#:~:text=Our%20data%20shows%20that%20more,by%20148%2C591%20from%202020%2D2021. (accessed 07.01.2024)

Elraiyah T, Prutsky G, Domecq JP et al (2016) A systematic review andmeta-analysis of off-loading methods for diabetic foot ulcers. J Vasc Surg 63(2 Suppl): 59S–68S.e1–2

Fife CE, Carter MJ, Walker DCHT et al (2014) Diabetic foot ulcer off-loading: the gap between evidence and practice. Data from the US Wound Registry. Adv Skin Wound Care 27(7): 310–6

Fife Health & Social Care Partnership (2015) Foot Protection and Offloading Guidance Pressure Ulcer Prevention 2015. Fife: NHS Fife Podiatry. Available at: https://hub.careinspectorate.com/media/1506/foot-protection-and-offloading-guidance-pressure-ulcer-prevention-2015.pdf (accessed 20.01.2024)

General Medical Council (2016) Mental Capacity Tool. Available online at: https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/learning-materials/mental-capacity-tool (accessed 24.01.2024)

Gohil K (2022) National Wound Care Strategy update: referrals to vascular services. Wounds UK 18(3): 64–5

Gonzalez JS, Vileikyte L, Ulbrecht JS et al (2010) Depression predicts first but not recurrent diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetologia 53(10): 2241–8

Greenhagen RM, Wukich DK (2009) Total contact casting for neuropathic ulcers: A lost art? J Dias Foot Compl 1:85‑93

Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P (2018) Diabetic foot ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes. Int Wound J 15(1): 43–52

International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (2023) Practical Guidelines on the Management of Diabetes-related Foot Disease: IWGDF 2023 Update. Available at: https://iwgdfguidelines.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/IWGDF-2023-01-Practical-Guidelines.pdf (accessed 10.01.2024)

Jeffcoate W, Game F, Turtle-Savage V et al (2017) Evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lightweight fibreglass heel casts in the management of ulcers of the heel in diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 21(34): 1–92

Kerr M, Barron E, Chadwick P et al (2019) The cost of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations to the National Health Service in England. Diabet Med 36(8): 995–1002

Kim PJ (2013) Biomechanics of the diabetic foot: consideration in limb salvage. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2(3): 107–1

Kirby KA (2001) Subtalar joint axis location and rotational equilibrium theory of foot function. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(9): 465–87

Lazzarini PA, Jarl G, Gooday C et al (2020) Effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal foot ulcers in persons with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 36(Suppl 1): e3275

Leese G, Stang D (2022) Diabetic foot screening: improving functionality for the future. The Diabetic Foot Journal 25(2): 5–7

Leibner ED, Brodsky JW, Edmonds BW et al (2006) Unloading mechanism in the Total Contact Cast. Foot Ankle Int 27(4): 281–5

Lewis J, Lipp A (2013) Pressure-relieving interventions for treating diabeticfoot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD002302

Mills JL, Conte MS, Armstrong DG et al (2014) The Society of Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg 59(1): 220–34

Morona JK, Buckley ES, Jones S et al (2013) Comparisonnof the clinical effectiveness of different off-loading devices for thetreatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: a sys-tematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 29(3): 183–93

Mueller MJ, Diamond JE, Sinacore DR et al (1989) Total contact casting in treatment of diabetic plantar ulcers. Controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Care 12(6): 384–8

Munro W, Stang D, Fletcher J et al (2021) Rededining and Demystifying Offloading for Diabetes Foot Care. London: The Diabetic Foot Journal

Najafi B, Grewal GS, Bharara M et al (2016) Can’t stand the pressure: the association between unprotected standing, walking, and wound healing in people with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11(4): 657–67

National Wound Care Strategy (2024) Recommendations for Foot Ulcers. July 2024. Available at: https://www.nationalwoundcarestrategy.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/NWCSP-Foot-Ulcer-Recommendations-final-15.07.2024.pdf (accessed 01.09.2024)

NHS Health Education England (2022) Opportunity to Learn More About Health Literacy. Available at: https://www.hee. nhs.uk/about/how-we-work/your-area/midlands/midlands- news/opportunity-learn-more-about-health-literacy (accessed 31.10.2024)

NHS North West Coast Strategic Clinical Network (2017) Diabetes Footcare. Pathway Bluepront (2017). Liverpool: NHS North West Coast Strategic Clinical Network. Available at:https://www.england.nhs.uk/north/wp-content/uploads/ sites/5/2018/05/NWCSN_Diabetes_Footcare_Final_ Report_2017-1.pdf (accessed 07.01.2024)

NICE (2019) Diabetic Foot Problems: Prevention and Management [NG19]. London: NICE. Available at: https:// www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng19/resources/diabetic-foot- problems-prevention-and-management-1837279828933 (accessed 10.01.2024)

NICE (2022) Health Information: Are You Getting Your Message Across? London: NICE. Available at: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/collection/health-information- are-you-getting-your-message-across/ (accessed 31.01.2023)

Ousey K, Poole M, Holloway S, Harris S (2011) How can we maintain effective and relevant wound care education? Wounds UK 7(1): 145-7

Ousey K, Edward K-L (2014) Exploring resilience when living with a wound — an integrative literature review. Healthcare (Basel) 2(3): 346–55

Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J et al (2008) Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia 51(5): 747–55

Rodgers LC (2015) Overcoming Barriers To Adopting The Total Contact Cast In Your Practice. London: Podiatry Now. Available at: https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/podiatry/ overcoming-barriers-adopting-total-contact-cast-your- practice (accessed 22.01.2024)

Ross et al (2020) A preliminary investigation of cast anxiety in general orthopaedic practice. Arch Bone Jt Surg 8(1): 44–9

Shearman CP, Chong P (2023) Management of Diabetic Foot Complications (2nd edn.). London: Springer

Udovichenko OV, Gorohov SV, Ulianova IN et al (2013) Total- contact cast efficacy in diabetic foot ulcers: Clinical and pedographic points of view. The Diabetic Foot Journal 16: 115–20

Williams P, Bakewell Z, Akinlade B, Russell DA (2022) WIfI scoring: a reliable tool for risk stratification in the diabetic foot clinic. J Vasc Soc 1(3): 71–6

Woo K (2016) Cost-effectiveness of an easy-to-apply Total Contact Cast system for DFUs. Wound Care Canada 14(3): 26–7

World Union of Wound Healing Societies (2020) Optimising Wound Care Through Patient Engagement. London: Wounds International

This document is supported by Essity. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Essity
Related content
A good sense of EWMA
Understanding personality traits: could this help us support better foot self-care behaviours in people with diabetes?
Amputation inequalities across a large metropolitan area of England and effect of a ‘high-risk’ rather than ‘diabetes-only’ multidisciplinary approach to lower-limb wound care 2015/16 to 2021/22
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.