Your web browser is out of date.

For your security and improved experience online, please update your browser.

This site is intended for healthcare professionals only
Share this article
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Adjunctive treatments for wound healing in the diabetic foot

Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers aims to achieve wound closure as quickly as possible – the longer a diabetic foot ulcer remains unhealed, the greater the risk of infection, hospitalisation and limb amputation. The large numbers of people with diabetic foot ulcers that end in lower limb amputations have led to the development of new treatment modalities. Clinical evidence suggests that, when used in conjunction with standard regimens, the new treatments heal more ulcers and significantly reduce the time to healing compared with standard care alone. This article reviews some of these adjunctive therapies and the evidence supporting their use.

The diabetic foot needs multidisciplinary management to control mechanical, wound, microbiological, vascular, metabolic and educational aspects of care. Foot ulcers require pressure relief (mechanical control), sharp debridement and dressings (wound control); neuro-ischaemic ulcers may need vascular intervention (vascular control). Achieving good metabolic control of blood glucose, serum lipids and blood pressure is also important, as is education to teach proper foot care (Edmonds, 2006).

When diabetic foot ulcers fail to heal in response to standard management, adjunctive treatments to stimulate wound healing may have to be used. These include vacuum-assisted closure, growth factors, skin substitutes, extracellular matrix proteins, protease inhibitors and hyperbaric oxygen.

Vacuum-assisted closure
The vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy unit (KCI Medical, Kidlington) has become an established method to achieve closure of wounds, including diabetic foot wounds. The VAC therapy unit applies gentle negative pressure to the wound through a tube and foam sponge. These are applied to the wound over a dressing and sealed in place with a plastic film to create a vacuum. The sponge is replaced every 2–3 days. Exudate from the wound is sucked along the tube to a disposable collecting chamber. It is important to use the therapy unit only on wounds that have been thoroughly debrided (KCI Medical Ltd, 2005; Antony and Terrazas, 2004; Webb, 2002). The negative pressure improves the dermal blood supply and stimulates granulation (Banwell and Téot, 2003; Jones et al, 2005), which can form even over bone and tendon. It reduces bacterial colonisation and diminishes oedema and interstitial fluid (McCallon et al, 2000). Recently, instillation tubes have been added to the therapy unit to facilitate the application of topical antibiotics.

In the diabetic foot, the application of a continuous negative pressure of 125 mmHg to the wound has been found useful in promoting healing (KCI Medical Ltd, 2005). The VAC therapy unit is used to treat postoperative wounds after minor amputations or surgical debridement in the diabetic ischaemic foot, especially when revascularisation is not possible (Armstrong and Lavery, 2005). Increasingly, it is also being used to treat postoperative wounds in people with diabetic feet who are in end-stage renal failure and on dialysis treatment, and also to treat heel ulcers.

Initial studies to assess the outcome of VAC therapy in diabetic foot ulcers were promising. Armstrong and colleagues (2002) investigated the outcomes of VAC therapy in 31 people who had surgical debridement for indolent diabetic foot wounds (mean pre-therapy wound duration of 25.4 weeks). A VAC device was applied for 4.7 ± 4.2 weeks: 90.3 % (n=28) of wounds healed at the level of debridement in a mean of 8.1 weeks and only 9.7 % (n=3) went on to higher level amputation.

A pivotal, adequately powered key study has recently been completed (Armstrong and Lavery, 2005). In this US-based study, 162 people with postoperative wounds following partial diabetic foot amputation were enrolled in a 16-week, 18-centre, randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either negative pressure wound therapy delivered via a VAC therapy unit (n=77), with dressing changes every 48 hours, or standard moist wound care (control group; n=85). More participants were healed in the VAC group than in the control group (43 [56 %] versus 33 [39 %], P=0.040). The rate of wound healing, based on the time to complete closure, was faster in the VAC group than in the control group (P=0.005).

Guidelines on the use of VAC therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds were drawn up by a multidisciplinary expert panel convened at the Tucson Expert Consensus Conference on VAC Therapy in 2004 (Armstrong et al, 2004). These were updated in February 2006 by a second multidisciplinary expert panel at a consensus conference on VAC therapy, held in Miami (Andros et al, 2006).

Growth factors
Growth factors play an important role in wound repair by stimulating chemotaxis, cellular proliferation, extracellular matrix formation and angiogenesis (Harding et al, 2002); deficiency in these factors might lead to impaired wound healing (Harding et al, 2002). Platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB) stimulates fibroblasts and other connective tissue cells located in the skin and is beneficial in enhancing wound-healing processes (Senet, 2004).

Four placebo-controlled trials of PDGF-BB have been carried out. These included a pivotal study of 382 people, which showed that Regranex Gel (100 µg/g [Janssen-Cilag, High Wycombe]) healed 50 % of chronic diabetic ulcers – significantly more than the 35 % healed with a placebo gel (Wieman et al, 1998).

Skin substitutes
Tissue-engineered skin substitutes have emerged as a potential new therapy for chronic non-healing wounds, including diabetic foot ulcers. Skin substitutes can be divided into cell-containing matrices and cell-free matrices. 

Cell-containing matrices
Allogeneic products that use living cells with matrix include Apligraf (Novartis, Camberley), Dermagraft (Smith and Nephew, Hull), and OrCel (OrTec International, New York, US).

Apligraf is a bilayered skin substitute. The epidermal layer is formed by human keratinocytes and the dermal layer contains human fibroblasts in a bovine collagen lattice (Veves et al, 2001). It is manufactured under aseptic conditions from human neonatal foreskin tissue.

In a randomised 12-week trial in 208 people with non-infected, neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers, 56 % of those treated with the bilayered construct, Apligraf, achieved complete wound closure, compared with 38 % in controls (saline moistened guaze; P=0.0042). In addition, Apligraf reduced the time to complete closure (median 65 days versus 90 days, P=0.0026). Studies have demonstrated that Apligraf works through the delivery of growth factors and cytokines to the chronic wound environment (Dinh and Veves, 2006).

Dermagraft is an artificial human dermis. Human fibroblast cells obtained from neonatal foreskin are cultivated on a three-dimensional polyglactin scaffold.

In a randomised, controlled, multicentre study of 281 people with neuropathic foot ulcers, significantly more participants in the Dermagraft group than the control group (who were treated with saline moistened guaze) experienced complete wound closure within 12 weeks (50.8 % versus 31.7 %, P<0.05; Naughton et al, 1997).

In another randomised study of 12 weeks duration, 340 people with chronic diabetic foot ulcers were treated with living foreskin fibroblasts in a polyglactin-910 surgical mesh. The incidence of complete wound closure of neuropathic foot ulcers by study end was 30 % in the active group and 18 % in the control group (P=0.023; Marston et al, 2003) 

OrCel, a bilayered cellular matrix (BCM), is a porous collagen sponge containing cocultured allogeneic keratinocytes and fibroblasts harvested from human neonatal foreskin. 

Forty people with chronic, diabetic, neuropathic foot ulcers were randomised to receive either standard care (moist saline gauze cover) for up to 12 weeks (n=20) or active treatment (n=20). Active treatment comprised standard care plus an application of BCM at each weekly visit for up to a total of six applications, followed by standard care alone for an additional 6 weeks or until complete healing. By 12 weeks, seven of the 20 wounds (35 %) treated with BCM showed complete healing compared with four of the 20 wounds (20 %) treated with standard care alone. Diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers treated with BCM showed a faster rate of wound healing than those treated with standard care alone. Mean wound closure rates over the course of the trial were faster for BCM-treated wounds than for wounds treated with standard care alone (1.8 % per day versus 1.1 % per day, P=0.0087; Lipkin et al, 2003). 

Cell-free matrices
Cell-free matrices interact with the wound bed, releasing growth factors that stimulate wound healing and angiogenesis (Martin et al, 2005).

GraftJacket (Wright Medical UK Ltd, Chester) is an allogeneic acellular matrix graft. In its development it undergoes a process that removes the epidermal and dermal cells and thus does not trigger an immune response (Martin et al, 2005).

Recently, experience has been gained with the use of this therapy in the treatment of diabetic wounds (Martin et al, 2005). Seventeen patients received surgical debridement and were placed on therapy consisting of a single application of an acellular matrix graft, with weekly dressing changes. This led to healing in 82.4 % of wounds, which initially measured a mean of 4.6 ± 3.2 cm2, over the 20-week evaluation period (Martin et al, 2005).

OASIS Wound Matrix
OASIS Wound Matrix (Cook SIS Technology, Indiana, US) is derived from the pig small intestine submucosa. A recent study compared the healing rates at 12 weeks for full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers treated with OASIS Wound Matrix and those treated with Regranex Gel (Niezgoda et al, 2005). After 12 weeks’ treatment, complete wound closure was observed in 49 % of the OASIS-treated patients (n=18) compared with only 28 % of the Regranex-treated group (n=10; P=0.055).

Integra (Integra NeuroScience, Andover) is a bilayered matrix wound dressing which provides a scaffold for dermal regeneration and organisation, and protection for the treated wound. As healing progresses, an endogenous collagen matrix is deposited by fibroblasts. When the dermal layer is adequately revascularised, the temporary silicone layer is removed and a thin, meshed layer of the person’s own skin (epidermal autograft) is placed over the ‘neodermis’.

Extracellular matrix proteins
In addition to the use of growth factors and skin substitutes, there has also been considerable interest in the application of extracellular matrix proteins to accelerate healing in diabetic foot ulcers (Edmonds et al, 2000).

Hyaluronic acid is a polysaccharide that facilitates the growth and movement of fibroblasts, but is unstable when applied to tissues (Edmonds et al, 2000). When esterified, as in hyaff, it becomes more stable and, in contact with wound exudate, produces a hydrophilic gel that covers the wound (Edmonds et al, 2000). This creates a hyaluronic acid-rich tissue interface that promotes granulation and healing.

In a controlled, randomised clinical trial, Hyaff-based autologous grafts, both dermal and epidermal, were used to treat two groups of diabetic foot ulcers – plantar ulcers (n=42) and postoperative wounds on the dorsum of the foot (n=37; Caravaggi et al, 2003). Participants were randomised to either the control group (non-adherent paraffin gauze; n=36) or the treatment group (Hyaff-based autologous graft; n=43). People in both groups had off-loading, comprising total contact casting for plantar ulcers and a rigid-sole shoe for dorsal ulcers. After 11 weeks there was no significant difference in the rates of healing of plantar ulcers between the control and treatment groups, whereas the dorsal ulcers in the treatment group showed an increased rate of healing compared with the control group (67 % versus 31 %; P=0.049).

Protease inhibitors
A frequent characteristic of chronic wounds is elevated protease activities.

Promogran (Johnson & Johnson Ltd, Maidenhead) is a protease inhibitor dressing consisting of oxidised regenerated cellulose and collagen. It inhibits proteases in the wound and protects endogenous growth factors (Cullen et al, 2002). In a 12-week randomised controlled study of 276 people with chronic diabetic plantar ulcers, 37 % (51/138) of the Promogran-treated participants achieved complete wound closure compared with 28 % (39/138) of the control group who were treated with saline moistened gauze (P=0.12; Veves et al, 2002).

Hyperbaric oxygen
Adjunctive systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy has been shown to reduce the number of major amputations in people with ischaemic diabetic feet (Faglia et al, 1996). Studies involving relatively small groups of people have shown that hyperbaric oxygen accelerates the healing of ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers. It is thus reasonable to use hyberbaric oxygen as an adjunctive therapy in severe or life-threatening wounds (Wunderlich et al, 2000).

Concluding remarks
One important question is when to introduce these agents in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Clinical decisions about when to use advanced or more experimental therapies may be based on healing rates. Studies in venous and diabetic ulcers suggest that an initial healing rate of >0.6 mm per week enables healthcare professionals to predict healing with a sensitivity and specificity of 80 % (Falanga and Sabolinski, 2000). These adjunctive treatments are expensive, hence they should not be used to replace basic treatments but to supplement them when there is difficulty in healing.

Antony S, Terrazas S (2004) A retrospective study: clinical experience using vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of wounds. Journal of the National Medical Association 96(8): 1073–7
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Abu-Rumman P, Espensen EH, Vazquez JR, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ (2002) Outcomes of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy on wounds of the diabetic foot. Ostomy/Wound Management 48(4): 64–8
Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, Boulton AJ, Frykberg RG, Kirsner RS, Lavery LA, Mills JL (2004) Guidelines regarding negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the diabetic foot. Ostomy/Wound Management 50 (4B Suppl)
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA; Diabetic Foot Study Consortium (2005) Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366(9498): 1704–10
Andros G, Armstrong DG, Attinger C, Boulton AJM, Frykberg RG, Josoph WF et al (2006) Consensus Statement on Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (V.A.C.® Therapy) for the Management of Diabetic Foot Wounds. Ostomy/Wound Management 52(6 Suppl): 1–33
Banwell PE, Téot L (2003) Topical negative pressure (TNP): the evolution of a novel wound therapy. Journal of Wound Care12(1): 28–9
Caravaggi C, De Giglio R, Pritelli C, Sommaria M, Dalla Noce S, Faglia E et al (2003) HYAFF 11-based autologous dermal and epidermal grafts in the treatment of noninfected diabetic plantar and dorsal foot ulcers: a prospective, multicenter, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 26(10): 2853–9
Cullen B, Smith R, McCulloch E, Silcock D, Morrison L (2002) Mechanism of action of PROMOGRAN, a protease modulating matrix, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair and Regeneration 10(1): 16–25
Dinh TL, Veves A (2006) The efficacy of Apligraf in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery117(7 Suppl): 152S–157S; discussion 158S–159S
Edmonds M,Bates M, Doxford M, Gough A, Foster A (2000) New treatments in ulcer healing and wound infection.Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews Suppl 1: S51–4
Edmonds M (2006) Diabetic foot ulcers: practical treatment recommendations. Drugs 66(7): 913–29
Faglia E, Favales F, Aldeghi A, Calia P, Quarantiello A, Oriani G et al (1996) Adjunctive systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy in treatment of severe prevalently ischemic diabetic foot ulcer. A randomized study. Diabetes Care 19(12): 1338–43
Falanga V, Sabolinski ML (2000) Prognostic factors for healing of venous and diabetic ulcers. Wounds 12(5 Suppl A): 42A–46A
Harding KG, Morris HL, Patel GK (2002) Science, medicine and the future: healing chronic wounds. British Medical Journal324(7330): 160–3
Jones SM, Banwell PE, Shakespeare PG (2005) Advances in wound healing: topical negative pressure therapy. Postgraduate Medical Journal 81(956): 353–7
KCI Medical Ltd (2005) V.A.C Therapy Clinical Guidelines. A reference source for clinicians. KCI Medical Ltd, Kidlington. Available from http:// (accessed 11.09.2006)
Lipkin S, Chaikof E, Isseroff Z, Silverstein P (2003) Effectiveness of bilayered cellular matrix in healing of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a multicenter pilot trial. Wounds 15(7): 230–6
Marston WA, Hanft J, Norwood P, Pollak R Dermagraft Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group (2003). The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a prospective randomized trial. Diabetes Care26(6): 1701–5
Martin BR, Sangalang M, Wu S, Armstrong DG (2005) Outcomes of allogenic acellular matrix therapy in treatment of diabetic foot wounds: an initial experience. International Wound Journal 2(2):161–5
McCallon SK, Knight CA, Valiulus JP, Cunningham MW, McCulloch JM, Farinas LP (2000) Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds. Ostomy/Wound Management 46(8): 28–34
Naughton G, Mansbridge J, Gentzkow G (1997) A metabolically active human dermal replacement for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Artificial Organs 21(11): 1203–10
Niezgoda JA, Van Gils CC, Frykberg RG, Hodde JP (2005) Randomized controlled trial comparing OASIS Wound Matrix to Regranex Gel for diabetic ulcers. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 18(5 Pt 1): 258–66
Senet P (2004) [Becaplermin gel (Regranex gel)]. Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie 131(4): 351–8
Veves A, Falanga V, Armstrong DG, Sabolinski ML; Apligraf Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study. (2001) Graftskin, a human skin equivalent, is effective in the management of noninfected neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial. Diabetes Care 24(2): 290–5
Veves A, Sheehan P, Pham HT (2002) A randomized, controlled trial of Promogran (a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Archives of Surgery 137(7): 822–7
Webb LX (2002) New techniques in wound management: vacuum-assisted wound closure. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 10(5): 303–11
Wieman TJ, Smiell JM, Su Y (1998) Efficacy and safety of a topical gel formulation of recombinant human platelet derived growth factor-BB (becaplermin) in patients with non-healing diabetic ulcers. A phase III randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Diabetes Care 21(5): 822–7
Wunderlich RP, Peters EJ, Lavery LA (2000) Systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy: lower-extremity wound healing and the diabetic foot. Diabetes Care 23(10): 1551–5

Share this article
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
For the latest news and articles

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

© Copyright Omniamed Communications. All Rights Reserved​
108 Cannon Street, London, EC4N 6EU. Registered in the United Kingdom​
Omniamed logo white
For the latest news and articles

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals


By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

DiabetesontheNet Logo

This website is for UK healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a UK healthcare professional below.