This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Sock it to me: Diabetic foot care in the community

Brian Karet

All of us delivering diabetes care already know by now that diabetes is increasingly common: it currently affects approximately 2.3 million people in the UK (Diabetes UK, 2006). It is also an expensive condition, taking up an estimated 10% of NHS and 5% of social costs (DoH, 2006). We also know it is the commonest cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations – one of the reasons we spend so much time in clinics optimising care and detecting complications.

But how well do we understand the impact of foot disease and how organised are we in assessing and treating it? At any one time about a quarter of our patients have diabetic neuropathy and around 2 % will have a foot ulcer (Young et al, 1993; Ramsey et al, 1999). Additionally, the costs incurred by foot ulcers escalate by five hundred percent in the first year after diagnosis.

A person with diabetes is 13 times more likely to have a lower limb amputation than someone who does not (Morris et al, 1998). It is hardly surprising that quality of life is reduced after an amputation, but people with current foot ulcers also rate their quality of life significantly lower than those whose ulcers have healed (Ragnarson Tennvall and Apelqvist, 2000). Peripheral vascular disease is implicated in more than half of all diabetic foot problems (Walters et al, 1992) and in a recent study over half the participants with symptomatic peripheral vascular disease died within 5 years – people with diabetes faring particularly badly (Missouris et al, 2004).

So there is plenty of bad news but there is also some evidence that structured multidisciplinary care combined with patient education does improve outcomes for people with foot problems (Melville et al, 2000). So what should a community based diabetes foot care service look like? The components spelled out by NICE (2005) are described in Box 1.

As long as all these components are in place, the placement and organisation of  services can be left to local diabetes planners. However, there are some factors that are crucial to success. For example, it is almost impossible to have regular reviews without effective call and recall systems, which in turn require integrated computer systems – without which comprehensive audit cannot be undertaken.

The training and educating of healthcare professionals is crucial and everyone involved in delivering diabetes care should know how to do a basic foot examination involving three core activities:

  • inspection
  • monofilament sensation testing
  • palpation of pulses.

Early recognition and treatment of foot problems is important to avoid chronic problems. These early indicators include superficial fungal infection best treated with terbinafine cream.

We need to use the podiatry, vascular and wound care expertise in out multidisciplinary teams and establish clear pathways in order to make sure all people with diabetes get regular foot care and that everyone has the skills to refer appropriately those people more at risk. In the following article, Neil Baker and Duncan Fowler comprehensively describe how to examine the diabetic foot – so no one should be wary of saying ‘come on then, get your socks off!’

All of us delivering diabetes care already know by now that diabetes is increasingly common: it currently affects approximately 2.3 million people in the UK (Diabetes UK, 2006). It is also an expensive condition, taking up an estimated 10% of NHS and 5% of social costs (DoH, 2006). We also know it is the commonest cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations – one of the reasons we spend so much time in clinics optimising care and detecting complications.

But how well do we understand the impact of foot disease and how organised are we in assessing and treating it? At any one time about a quarter of our patients have diabetic neuropathy and around 2 % will have a foot ulcer (Young et al, 1993; Ramsey et al, 1999). Additionally, the costs incurred by foot ulcers escalate by five hundred percent in the first year after diagnosis.

A person with diabetes is 13 times more likely to have a lower limb amputation than someone who does not (Morris et al, 1998). It is hardly surprising that quality of life is reduced after an amputation, but people with current foot ulcers also rate their quality of life significantly lower than those whose ulcers have healed (Ragnarson Tennvall and Apelqvist, 2000). Peripheral vascular disease is implicated in more than half of all diabetic foot problems (Walters et al, 1992) and in a recent study over half the participants with symptomatic peripheral vascular disease died within 5 years – people with diabetes faring particularly badly (Missouris et al, 2004).

So there is plenty of bad news but there is also some evidence that structured multidisciplinary care combined with patient education does improve outcomes for people with foot problems (Melville et al, 2000). So what should a community based diabetes foot care service look like? The components spelled out by NICE (2005) are described in Box 1.

As long as all these components are in place, the placement and organisation of  services can be left to local diabetes planners. However, there are some factors that are crucial to success. For example, it is almost impossible to have regular reviews without effective call and recall systems, which in turn require integrated computer systems – without which comprehensive audit cannot be undertaken.

The training and educating of healthcare professionals is crucial and everyone involved in delivering diabetes care should know how to do a basic foot examination involving three core activities:

  • inspection
  • monofilament sensation testing
  • palpation of pulses.

Early recognition and treatment of foot problems is important to avoid chronic problems. These early indicators include superficial fungal infection best treated with terbinafine cream.

We need to use the podiatry, vascular and wound care expertise in out multidisciplinary teams and establish clear pathways in order to make sure all people with diabetes get regular foot care and that everyone has the skills to refer appropriately those people more at risk. In the following article, Neil Baker and Duncan Fowler comprehensively describe how to examine the diabetic foot – so no one should be wary of saying ‘come on then, get your socks off!’

REFERENCES:

Diabetes UK (2006) State of the Nations 2006. Diabetes UK, London 
DoH (2006) Turning the corner: improving diabetes care. DoH, London
Melville A Richardson R, McIntosh A et al (2000) Quality in Health Care 9: 137–41
Missouris CG, Kalaitzidis RG, Kerry SM et al (2004) British Journal of Diabetes and Vascular Disease 4: 196–200
Morris AD McAlpine R, Steinke D et al (1998) Diabetes Care 21: 738–43
NICE (2005) Commissioning a foot care service for people with diabetes. NICE, London
Ragnarson Tennvall G, Apelqvist J (2000) Journal of Diabetes and its Complications 14:235–41
Ramsey SD, Sandhu N, Newton K et al (1999) Diabetes Care22: 382–7
Walters DA, Gatling W, Mullee MA et al (1992) Diabetic Medicine 9: 354–8
Young MJ, Boulton AJM, MacLeod AF et al (1993) Diabetologia 36: 150–4

Related content
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.