Your web browser is out of date.

For your security and improved experience online, please update your browser.

This site is intended for healthcare professionals only
×
Share this article
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email
Share on print
Print

SGLT2 inhibitors and atrial fibrillation

The high personal costs associated with atrial fibrillation, and the potential benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in reducing the burden of this common diabetes comorbidity.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, with a lifetime risk of around 25% in those over 40 years of age (Lloyd-Jones et al, 2004). People with diabetes have a roughly 40% greater risk of developing AF than those without diabetes (Huxley et al, 2011). AF is an independent risk factor for stroke and heart failure, and is associated with more severe strokes due to the large clots that embolise from the heart (Lin et al, 1996; Berg et al, 2019).

A recent study by Papazoglou et al (2021) has highlighted the increased risk associated with comorbid diabetes in people with AF. In a substudy of the MISOAC-AF (Motivational Interviewing to Support Oral AntiCoagulation Adherence in patients with non-valvular AF) trial, 1140 people with AF, of whom a third had diabetes, were followed for a median of 2.6 years. Over that time frame, 36% of the cohort died, mostly from cardiovascular causes. In particular, people with diabetes were significantly more likely to die from cardiovascular causes than those without the condition (34.9% vs 23.5%; P<0.001). After adjustment for other risk factors, diabetes remained a significant predictor of adverse outcomes, increasing the risk of all-cause death by 44%, cardiovascular death by 44%, cardiac arrest by 73% and stroke by 87%. Glycaemic control significantly affected mortality, with each 11 mmol/mol (1.0%) increase almost doubling the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and a linear association between HbA1c and death. The risk of death was significantly lower at HbA1c levels under 44 mmol/mol (6.2%). Other factors associated with survival were age; estimated glomerular filtration rate; and use of beta-blockers, digoxin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and novel oral anticoagulants after discharge.

These findings concur with those of other AF studies, which showed a nearly doubled risk of mortality in people with AF and comorbid diabetes compared to those without diabetes. The results highlight the high personal costs associated with AF, particularly in those with diabetes, and emphasise the urgent need to manage both glycaemia and other cardiovascular risk factors in people who develop AF.

A role for SGLT2 inhibitors?

Another study, published in the same issue of Cardiovascular Diabetology, provides evidence that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may be effective in preventing new-onset AF in people with type 2 diabetes. Using a data-mining approach, Bonora et al (2021) searched the US Food and Drug Administration’s adverse event reporting system to compare rates of AF between SGLT2 inhibitors and other glucose-lowering drugs. Between 2014 and the end of 2019, there were 62098 adverse events in which an SGLT2 inhibitor  was suspect or concomitant, compared with 642031 reports involving other glucose-lowering drugs.

The reporting of AF was significantly lower with SGLT2 inhibitors than with other diabetes drugs (4.8 versus 8.7 events per 1000 reports; P<0.001), implying a potential protective effect. The results were consistent when a number of sensitivity analyses were carried out to exclude effects of other treatments, diabetes severity, kidney disease and cardiovascular disease as treatment indications, and dilution by other SGLT2 inhibitor adverse events such as urinary tract infections and diabetic ketoacidosis. These real-world findings support the results from clinical and cardiovascular outcome trials and observational studies suggesting that SGLT2 inhibitors can prevent AF in people with type 2 diabetes (Li et al, 2020; Ling et al, 2020; Zelniker et al, 2020; Okunrintemi et al, 2021). The authors have previously proposed a number of mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors might reduce the risk of AF (Bonora et al, 2020), many of which may also explain the drug class’s known effects on reducing heart failure.

Conclusion

The precise reasons for the association between AF and diabetes remain unexplained. However, it is encouraging that a widely used glucose-lowering drug class can potentially reduce the burden of this common diabetes comorbidity. Above all, these studies remind us of the need to consider the cardiovascular aspects of diabetes management.

Berg DD, Wiviott SD, Scirica BM et al (2019) Heart failure risk stratification and efficacy of sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 140: 1569–77
Bonora BM, Avogaro A, Fadini GP (2020) Extraglycemic effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors: a review of the evidence. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 13: 161–74
Bonora BM, Raschi E, Avogaro A, Fadini GP (2021) SGLT-2 inhibitors and atrial fibrillation in the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system. Cardiovasc Diabetol 20: 39
Huxley RR, Filion KB, Konety S, Alonso A (2011) Meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 108: 56–62
Li WJ, Chen XQ, Xu LL et al (2020) SGLT2 inhibitors and atrial fibrillation in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol 19: 130
Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M et al (1996) Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Study. Stroke 27: 1760–4
Ling AW, Chan CC, Chen SW et al (2020) The risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Cardiovasc Diabetol 19: 188
Lloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP et al (2004) Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 110: 1042–6
Okunrintemi V, Mishriky BM, Powell JR, Cummings DM (2021) Sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and atrial fibrillation in the cardiovascular and renal outcome trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 23: 276–80
Papazoglou AS, Kartas A, Samaras A et al (2021) Prognostic significance of diabetes mellitus in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Diabetol 20: 40
Zelniker TA, Bonaca MP, Furtado RHM et al (2020) Effect of dapagliflozin on atrial fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial. Circulation 141: 1227–34

Share this article
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
For the latest news and articles

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

© Copyright Omniamed Communications. All Rights Reserved​
108 Cannon Street, London, EC4N 6EU. Registered in the United Kingdom​
Omniamed logo white
For the latest news and articles

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

DiabetesontheNet Logo

This website is for UK healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a UK healthcare professional below.