This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Prescribing pearls: A guide to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)

David Morris
The Prescribing pearls series focuses on practical prescribing of key drugs in the management of diabetes and its complications, sharing insights from experienced prescribers on how to optimise benefits and minimise adverse effects. The guides are concise, current and contain information relevant to primary care teams. This guide focuses on angiotensin receptor blockers.

What are ARBs?

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) operate on the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and, like ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is), are used in the treatment of hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney disease, notably in the case of diabetic nephropathy. They can also be prescribed for prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with a previous myocardial infarction or at high risk of a cardiovascular event.

ARBs have similar efficacy to ACE-Is across a range of indications but carry the advantage of reduced side-effects, with a lower incidence of drug-induced cough and angioedema. Thus, they are frequently chosen when ACE-Is cannot be tolerated.

ARBs are non-peptide molecules with clear similarity in molecular structure (indicating a class effect).

Mechanisms of action1

Effects on blood pressure

●  Inhibition of the action of angiotensin II (a potent vasoconstrictor) facilitates vasodilation and lowers blood pressure (BP).

  • Unlike ACE-Is, ARBs do not increase bradykinin levels, circumventing the bradykinin-induced cough and angioedema that can arise with use of ACE-Is.

●  Inhibition of angiotensin II activity results in decreased aldosterone levels, reducing sodium and, hence, water retention in the kidneys (natriuresis), leading to reduced blood volume, thus lowering BP. ARBs may also counter direct sodium and water retention by angiotensin II itself.

Effects on heart failure

●  The vasodilatory effects of ARBs reduce afterload, enabling increased cardiac output in heart failure.

●  Myocyte hypertrophy is reduced, protecting against left ventricular dysfunction.

●  Following myocardial infarction, the renin–angiotensin system is activated, and this can lead to left ventricular dilation and impaired function. ARBs counter these effects.

●  ARBs also act centrally on the autonomic nervous system, inhibiting sympathetic activity, which protects against arrhythmias and the development of heart failure.

Renal effects

●  Vasodilation of the glomerular efferent arterioles reduces intraglomerular pressure and preserves the glomerular basement membrane; thus, ARBs have a renoprotective effect.

Licensed indications

The licensed indications for ARBs vary between class members but include:

●  Hypertension: alone or in conjunction with other anti-hypertensives.

●  Heart failure or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

●  Post-myocardial infarction: secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and heart failure.

●  Prevention of cardiovascular events in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes with organ damage.

●  Diabetic nephropathy.

Positioning in guidelines

Hypertension

●  NICE NG136 recommends ARBs (or ACE-Is) as first-line antihypertensives in people <55 years old.2

  • For those >55 years old and those with African or African–Caribbean ethnicity, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) should be offered as first-line antihypertensive agents, with thiazide-like diuretics an alternative if CCBs are not tolerated or contraindicated.

●  ARBs (or ACE-Is) are first-line treatment for hypertension for all adults with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes because of their cardiorenal protective properties.2,3

●  ADA guidelines recommend ARBs (or ACE-Is) as first-line antihypertensives for people with diabetes or established coronary artery disease.4

●  ARBs are a second-line option for a person whose hypertension is not controlled with a CCB (or thiazide-like diuretic) and can also be added to a combination of a CCB and thiazide-like diuretic as part of triple therapy.2

●  If an ACE-I is poorly tolerated (e.g. because of cough), an ARB can be offered.2

●  For people with African or African–Caribbean ethnicity, an ARB should be chosen ahead of an ACE-I.2

Heart failure (NICE NG106)5

●  For people intolerant of ACE-Is, ARBs should be offered as an alternative first-line treatment to individuals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (alongside a beta-blocker).

●  Valsartan in combination with the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril is recommended as an option for symptomatic (NYHA class II–IV symptoms) heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (35% or less) in people previously established on either an ARB or ACE-I.

Chronic kidney disease (NICE NG203)6

Whether or not hypertension is present, ARBs have an important role in treating chronic kidney disease (CKD), notably when albuminuria is present, to slow the progression of renal disease and reduce cardiovascular risk.

●  For people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, offer an ARB licensed for diabetic nephropathy (or an ACE-I), titrated to the highest licensed dose tolerated, if urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (uACR) is 3 mg/mmol or more.

●  For people without diabetes, offer an ARB (or ACE-I) titrated to the highest licensed dose tolerated if uACR is ≥70 mg/mmol. If hypertension is also present, offer if uACR is >30 mg/mmol.

●  ADA guidelines recommend an ARB (or ACE-I) for people with diabetes who have albuminuria to prevent the progression of renal disease.4

Acute coronary syndromes and stable angina (NICE NG185)7

If people are intolerant of an ACE-I, an ARB may be offered, titrated up and continued indefinitely:

●  Post-myocardial infarction for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (alongside dual anti-platelet therapy, beta-blockers and statins).

●  If there is established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (e.g. previous myocardial infarction, stable angina).8

Principal effects

●  ARBs are effective in reducing BP and preventing end-organ damage, including cardiovascular events, either as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents.9

  • ARBs have the advantage of better tolerability than ACE-Is, with reduced incidence of cough and angioedema.

●  In people with diabetes and hypertension (without other complications), ARBs have similar cardiorenal outcomes as other antihypertensive agents.10

  • In individuals with hypertension, diabetes and signs of left ventricular hypertrophy, losartan was found to be superior to the beta-blocker atenolol in reducing the primary composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death.11

●  ARBs reduce all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death and hospitalisation for heart failure in individuals with symptomatic congestive heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared with placebo.12

  • Comparison studies with ACE-Is indicate that ARBs provide equivalent outcomes for people with heart failure.13

●  ARBs are an effective alternative to ACE-Is in reducing mortality post-myocardial infarction in those with left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure.14,15

●  Irbesartan was found to reduce the progression of microalbuminuria and facilitate reversion to normoalbuminuria compared with placebo in people with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.16

  • Irbesartan and losartan have demonstrated reductions in decline in renal function and incidence of end-stage renal disease in people with established diabetic nephropathy.17,18

  • In all of these studies with ARBs, benefits were accrued independently of BP-lowering effects.

  • Renoprotection from ARBs extends to normotensive people with diabetes and proteinuria, notably if uACR is >30 mg/mmol.19 ARBs also attenuate decline in eGFR and proteinuria in people with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease.20

●  ARBs have equivalent benefits to ACE-Is. In people with diabetes, ARBs are as effective as ACE-Is both in renoprotection and cardiovascular protection (cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, hospitalisation for heart failure).21

  • In populations not limited to having diabetes, ARBs appear to provide similar benefits to ACE-Is in lowering BP and improving total mortality and cardiovascular outcomes and in reducing proteinuria.22,23

Contraindications

●  Pregnancy and where pregnancy is planned: teratogenic effects, including reduced fetal renal function and oligohydramnios.

●  Breastfeeding: limited information.

●  Hypersensitivity reactions.

●  Bilateral renal artery stenosis: risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).

●  Severe hepatic impairment.

Cautions

●  Aortic or mitral valve stenosis: risk of severe hypotension.

●  History of angioedema.

●  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

●  Hypovolaemia: ARB can reduce renal function and predispose to AKI and hyperkalaemia under these circumstances.

●  High-dose diuretic therapy (e.g. >80 mg furosemide).

●  Low systolic blood pressure (<100 mmHg): risk of hypotension.

●  Reduce dose in moderate hepatic impairment.

Drug interactions

●  Avoid using ARBs and ACE-Is in combination – outcomes are not improved and there is increased risk of hyperkalaemia and AKI.24,25

●  ARBs should not be used in combination with aliskiren (a direct renin inhibitor) in people with diabetes.

Adverse effects

●  The incidence of dry cough with ARBs is significantly less than with ACE-Is because bradykinin levels are not raised. If a cough arises with an ACE-I, an ARB can be offered.

●  Hyperkalaemia: secondary to reduced levels of aldosterone.

  • Higher risk if other potassium-retaining medications are being used, such as potassium-retaining diuretics (e.g. amiloride) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (e.g. spironolactone).26

  • More likely if initial eGFR is <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, or if initial potassium level is >4.5 mmol/L.

●  Hyponatraemia: secondary to reduced levels of aldosterone.

●  Angioedema: rare, but potentially life-threatening swelling of face, lips and upper airway.

  • ARBs have a 2–3-fold lower risk than ACE-Is.27

  • Increased risk of angioedema in people of African and African–Caribbean origin, so choose ARB in preference to ACE-I in this ethnic group.2

  • If angioedema experienced with ACE-I then avoid ARB.2

●  Acute kidney injury: higher risk if pre-existing CKD or renal artery stenosis; can be precipitated by hypovolaemia.

●  Hypotension: higher risk of first-dose hypotension in individuals with heart failure and low systolic blood pressure taking high dose of loop diuretics (e.g. furosemide).

  • Start with a very low dose of ARB under these circumstances.

Prescribing tips5,6,26

Initiation

●  Have available baseline electrolytes and renal function before starting ARBs.

●  Start ARBs at a low dose and titrate up at short intervals (e.g. every 2 weeks), until the maximum tolerated or target dose is achieved.

●  Use lower starting doses and titrate up more slowly in older people or those with CKD (notably if eGFR is <45 mL/min/1.73 m2).

●  Avoid starting ARBs if baseline potassium is >5 mmol/L. If necessary, consider altering any potassium-retaining medication (e.g. amiloride, spironolactone) to allow use of ARBs.

Monitoring

●  Monitor blood pressure before and after each dose increment of ARB.

●  Measure serum electrolytes and renal function 1–2 weeks after starting an ARB and after each dose increment.

Potassium

●  If serum potassium is 5.0 mmol/L or more after starting an ARB, look for other causes of hyperkalaemia. If possible, stop or reduce the dose of potassium-sparing diuretics, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists or nephrotoxic drugs (e.g. NSAIDs).

●  A potassium level of up to 5.4 mmol/L is acceptable. If 5.5–6.0 mmol/L despite taking measures to reduce levels, reduce dose of (or if necessary, stop) ARB to achieve potassium levels that are acceptable.

●  If potassium rises to >6 mmol/L and other potassium-retaining medications have been discontinued where possible, stop ARB and refer immediately to hospital.

eGFR

●  A cumulative fall in eGFR of <25% or a rise in serum creatinine of <30% from baseline are acceptable. If these are exceeded, look for other possible causes, including hypovolaemia or concurrent medication (e.g. NSAIDs) before stopping or reducing the dose of ARB.

Sick day rules

●  Temporarily withdraw ARB if hypovolaemia (e.g. diarrhoea and vomiting) to reduce risk of AKI and hyperkalaemia – increased risk of AKI if taking loop diuretics.

Key summary table

REFERENCES:

1. Hill RD, Prabhakar NV (2023) Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). StatPearls. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537027/

2. NICE (2023) Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management [NG136]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/ng136

3. NICE (2022) Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management [NG17]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/ng17

4. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2024) 10. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: Standards of Care in Diabetes –Diabetes Care 47(Suppl 1): S179–218

5. NICE (2018) Chronic heart failure in adults: diagnosis and management [NG106]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/ng106

6. NICE (2021) Chronic kidney disease: assessment and management [NG203]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/ng203

7. NICE (2020) Acute coronary syndromes [NG185]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/ng185

8. NICE (2016) Stable angina: management [CG126]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/cg126

9. Gallo G, Volpe M, Rubattu S (2022) Angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension: A real-world perspective and current recommendations. Vasc Health Risk Manag 18: 507–15

10. Bangalore S, Fakheri R, Toklu B, Messerli FH (2016) Diabetes mellitus as a compelling indication for use of renin angiotensin system blockers: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMJ 352: i438

11. Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlöf B et al; LIFE study group (2002) Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): A randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 359: 1004–10

12. Young JB, Dunlap ME, Pfeffer MA et al; Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) investigators and committees (2004) Mortality and morbidity reduction with candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Results of the CHARM low-left ventricular ejection fraction trials. Circulation 110: 2618–26

13. Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Segal R et al (2000) Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: Randomised trial – the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II. Lancet 355: 1582–7

14. Dickstein K, Kjekshus J; OPTIMAAL steering committee of the OPTIMAAL study group (2002) Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: The OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Lancet 360: 752–60

15. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ et al; Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial investigators (2003) Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 349: 1893–906

16. Parving HH, Lehnert H, Bröchner-Mortensen J et al; Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria study group (2001) The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 345: 870–8

17. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D et al; RENAAL study investigators (2001) Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 345: 861–9

18. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR et al; Collaborative study group (2001) Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 345: 851–60

19. Palmer SC, Mavridis D, Navarese E et al (2015) Comparative efficacy and safety of blood pressure-lowering agents in adults with diabetes and kidney disease: A network meta-analysis. Lancet 385: 2047–56

20. Burnier M, Lin S, Ruilope L et al (2019) Effect of angiotensin receptor blockers on blood pressure and renal function in patients with concomitant hypertension and chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Press 28: 358–74

21. Catalá-López F, Macías Saint-Gerons D, González-Bermejo D et al (2016) Cardiovascular and renal outcomes of renin–angiotensin system blockade in adult patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review with network meta-analyses. PLoS Med 13: e1001971

22. Li EC, Heran BS, Wright JM (2014) Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014: CD009096

23. Xu R, Sun S, Huo Y et al (2015) Effects of ACEIs versus ARBs on proteinuria or albuminuria in primary hypertension: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 94: e1560

24. Fried LF, Emanuele N, Zhang JH et al; VA NEPHRON-D investigators (2013) Combined angiotensin inhibition for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med 369: 1892–903

25. Makani H, Bangalore S, Desouza KA et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of dual blockade of the renin–angiotensin system: Meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 346: f360

26. de Boer IH, Bangalore S, Benetos A et al (2017) Diabetes and hypertension: A position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 40: 1273–84

27. Toh S, Reichman ME, Houstoun M et al (2013) Comparative risk for angioedema associated with the use of drugs that target the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Arch Intern Med 172: 1582–9

Related content
;
Free for all UK & Ireland healthcare professionals

Sign up to all DiabetesontheNet journals

 

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that DiabetesontheNet.com are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our Privacy Policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.